FluidStack vs GPUhub: GPU Compute Price Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of GPU compute pricing, regions, billing models, and strengths for FluidStack and GPUhub. Updated July 2026.
Provider Overview
Strengths & Best For
FluidStack aggregates H100, A100, and consumer GPU capacity from data centers across the US and EU, offering competitive bulk pricing and flexible contracts for AI training and LLM fine-tuning workloads. Spot GPU rental is available alongside on-demand and reserved options, making it a cost-effective choice for teams with variable compute needs. A strong pick for EU-based teams wanting broad GPU availability without committing to a single provider.
- Competitive pricing
- EU/US coverage
- Spot availability
- Flexible contracts
GPUhub is a Southeast Asian GPU cloud based in Vietnam, offering H100, A100, and RTX instances at affordable APAC pricing for AI and ML workloads across the region. On-demand billing and local support make it one of the most accessible GPU cloud options for Vietnamese and Southeast Asian teams running LLM training, fine-tuning, and inference workloads. A strong regional option for APAC-based developers who want low-latency GPU access at competitive local prices.
- APAC presence
- Affordable pricing
- Local support
Live GPU Pricing
Region Coverage
Popular Comparisons
FluidStack — specialist provider
FluidStack aggregates H100, A100, and consumer GPU capacity from data centers across the US and EU, offering competitive bulk pricing and flexible contracts for AI training and LLM fine-tuning workloads. Spot GPU rental is available alongside on-demand and reserved options, making it a cost-effective choice for teams with variable compute needs. A strong pick for EU-based teams wanting broad GPU availability without committing to a single provider.
GPUhub — specialist provider
GPUhub is a Southeast Asian GPU cloud based in Vietnam, offering H100, A100, and RTX instances at affordable APAC pricing for AI and ML workloads across the region. On-demand billing and local support make it one of the most accessible GPU cloud options for Vietnamese and Southeast Asian teams running LLM training, fine-tuning, and inference workloads. A strong regional option for APAC-based developers who want low-latency GPU access at competitive local prices.
Billing model comparison
FluidStack uses a On-demand, Spot, Reserved billing model with a minimum commitment of None. GPUhub uses On-demand billing with a None minimum. Both providers offer flexible billing options — compare the live pricing table above to find the best rate for your specific GPU model and workload duration.
Which workloads each provider suits best
FluidStack is best suited for: Cost-sensitive training, EU-based teams, Flexible workloads. Its key strengths are competitive pricing, eu/us coverage, spot availability. GPUhub is best suited for: Southeast Asian teams, Cost-sensitive AI workloads, APAC inference. Its key strengths are apac presence, affordable pricing, local support. Both providers target similar workload profiles — the live pricing table above is the most reliable way to determine which offers better value for your specific GPU model and region requirements.
Support tiers and region coverage
FluidStack offers Standard → Enterprise support across 4 regions (US-East, US-West, EU-West and 1 more). GPUhub offers Standard support across 2 regions (VN, APAC). FluidStack's broader region footprint gives it an advantage for latency-sensitive workloads or teams with data residency requirements in specific geographies.
Provider background: FluidStack vs GPUhub
FluidStack was founded in 2019 and is headquartered in London, UK. GPUhub was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. FluidStack has 2 years more operational history than GPUhub, which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.