Compute Comparison
vs
All providers →

Modal vs Shadeform: GPU Compute Price Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of GPU compute pricing, regions, billing models, and strengths for Modal and Shadeform. Updated July 2026.

Provider Overview

Provider type
Specialist
Marketplace
Founded
2021
2023
Headquarters
New York, NY
San Francisco, CA
Billing model
Per-second serverless
On-demand, Spot
Min commitment
None
None
Support tier
Community → Enterprise
Community → Enterprise
Regions
2 regions
4 regions

Strengths & Best For

Modal

Modal is a serverless GPU cloud that lets Python developers run H100, A100, and T4 workloads with a simple decorator-based API and zero infrastructure management — cold starts measured in seconds. Per-second billing means you only pay for actual compute time, making it highly cost-efficient for bursty AI inference, LLM serving, and batch ML jobs. The go-to on-demand GPU cloud for ML engineers who want to ship fast without touching DevOps.

Strengths
  • Zero infra management
  • Instant cold starts
  • Python-native API
  • Per-second billing
Best For
ML engineersServerless inferenceRapid prototypingPython-first teams
Visit Modal
Shadeform

Shadeform is a GPU cloud aggregator that provisions H100, A100, RTX 4090, and many other GPU types across 30+ underlying cloud providers through a single unified API, automatically routing to the cheapest available instance matching your requirements. On-demand and spot GPU rental options are surfaced from the entire provider network, giving teams multi-cloud flexibility without managing multiple accounts. The fastest way to find and launch the lowest-cost GPU for any AI training or inference workload.

Strengths
  • 30+ provider network
  • Single API
  • Automatic cheapest-price routing
  • Wide GPU selection
Best For
Teams wanting multi-cloud flexibilityCost-optimized provisioningSpot-tolerant workloads
Visit Shadeform

Live GPU Pricing

No live pricing data available for these providers right now. View all live GPU prices →

Region Coverage

Modal2 regions
US-EastUS-West

Popular Comparisons

Modalspecialist provider

Modal is a serverless GPU cloud that lets Python developers run H100, A100, and T4 workloads with a simple decorator-based API and zero infrastructure management — cold starts measured in seconds. Per-second billing means you only pay for actual compute time, making it highly cost-efficient for bursty AI inference, LLM serving, and batch ML jobs. The go-to on-demand GPU cloud for ML engineers who want to ship fast without touching DevOps.

Shadeformmarketplace provider

Shadeform is a GPU cloud aggregator that provisions H100, A100, RTX 4090, and many other GPU types across 30+ underlying cloud providers through a single unified API, automatically routing to the cheapest available instance matching your requirements. On-demand and spot GPU rental options are surfaced from the entire provider network, giving teams multi-cloud flexibility without managing multiple accounts. The fastest way to find and launch the lowest-cost GPU for any AI training or inference workload.

Billing model comparison

Modal uses a Per-second serverless billing model with a minimum commitment of None. Shadeform uses On-demand, Spot billing with a None minimum. Both providers offer flexible billing options — compare the live pricing table above to find the best rate for your specific GPU model and workload duration.

Which workloads each provider suits best

Modal is best suited for: ML engineers, Serverless inference, Rapid prototyping, Python-first teams. Its key strengths are zero infra management, instant cold starts, python-native api. Shadeform is best suited for: Teams wanting multi-cloud flexibility, Cost-optimized provisioning, Spot-tolerant workloads. Its key strengths are 30+ provider network, single api, automatic cheapest-price routing. Marketplace providers aggregate GPU supply from multiple sources, often offering the lowest spot rates but with more variable availability and less predictable performance compared to dedicated providers.

Support tiers and region coverage

Modal offers Community → Enterprise support across 2 regions (US-East, US-West). Shadeform offers Community → Enterprise support across 4 regions (US, EU, APAC and 1 more). Shadeform's broader region footprint gives it an advantage for latency-sensitive workloads or teams with data residency requirements in specific geographies.

Provider background: Modal vs Shadeform

Modal was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in New York, NY. Shadeform was founded in 2023 and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA. Modal has 2 years more operational history than Shadeform, which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.