TensorDock vs Koyeb: GPU Compute Price Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of GPU compute pricing, regions, billing models, and strengths for TensorDock and Koyeb. Updated July 2026.
Provider Overview
Strengths & Best For
TensorDock offers H100, A100, RTX 4090, and RTX 3090 GPU instances across a distributed network of data centers at some of the most competitive on-demand and spot GPU rental prices available. Both on-demand and spot options are available, making it a popular budget AI training platform for cost-sensitive teams and researchers. A practical choice for LLM fine-tuning and batch inference workloads where price-per-GPU-hour is the primary concern.
- Very low prices
- Wide GPU variety
- Spot instances
- Global locations
Koyeb is a serverless GPU platform for deploying AI inference endpoints without managing infrastructure, with automatic scaling to zero and pay-per-use billing across EU and US regions. Git-based deployment and a simple dashboard make it easy to ship LLM inference APIs and AI model serving endpoints in minutes. A strong choice for teams that want zero-ops GPU inference with automatic scaling and no idle compute costs.
- Serverless — no infrastructure management
- Automatic scaling to zero
- EU and US regions
- Git-based deployment
Live GPU Pricing
Region Coverage
Popular Comparisons
TensorDock — specialist provider
TensorDock offers H100, A100, RTX 4090, and RTX 3090 GPU instances across a distributed network of data centers at some of the most competitive on-demand and spot GPU rental prices available. Both on-demand and spot options are available, making it a popular budget AI training platform for cost-sensitive teams and researchers. A practical choice for LLM fine-tuning and batch inference workloads where price-per-GPU-hour is the primary concern.
Koyeb — specialist provider
Koyeb is a serverless GPU platform for deploying AI inference endpoints without managing infrastructure, with automatic scaling to zero and pay-per-use billing across EU and US regions. Git-based deployment and a simple dashboard make it easy to ship LLM inference APIs and AI model serving endpoints in minutes. A strong choice for teams that want zero-ops GPU inference with automatic scaling and no idle compute costs.
Billing model comparison
TensorDock uses a On-demand, Spot billing model with a minimum commitment of None. Koyeb uses Pay-per-use (serverless) billing with a None minimum. Both providers offer flexible billing options — compare the live pricing table above to find the best rate for your specific GPU model and workload duration.
Which workloads each provider suits best
TensorDock is best suited for: Budget ML training, Batch inference, Cost-sensitive teams. Its key strengths are very low prices, wide gpu variety, spot instances. Koyeb is best suited for: Inference API deployments, Serverless AI apps, Teams wanting zero-ops GPU. Its key strengths are serverless — no infrastructure management, automatic scaling to zero, eu and us regions. Both providers target similar workload profiles — the live pricing table above is the most reliable way to determine which offers better value for your specific GPU model and region requirements.
Support tiers and region coverage
TensorDock offers Community → Pro support across 4 regions (US, EU, APAC and 1 more). Koyeb offers Community → Standard support across 2 regions (EU, US). TensorDock's broader region footprint gives it an advantage for latency-sensitive workloads or teams with data residency requirements in specific geographies.
Provider background: TensorDock vs Koyeb
TensorDock was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in Boston, MA. Koyeb was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Paris, France. TensorDock has 1 years more operational history than Koyeb, which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.