Provider Overview
Strengths & Best For
AWS offers on-demand, reserved, and spot GPU instances across EC2 P4d (A100), P5 (H100), and G6 (L40S) families, spanning 30+ global regions with enterprise SLAs and deep ML tooling via SageMaker. H100 and A100 clusters are available with InfiniBand networking for distributed LLM training and large-scale AI inference. The broadest ecosystem of any GPU cloud provider, making it the default choice for enterprises already invested in the AWS stack.
- Widest global region coverage
- Deep ecosystem integrations
- Enterprise SLAs
- Reserved instance discounts
Corelink is a GPU cloud offering H100, H200, A100, and L40S instances with flexible billing, spot availability, and competitive on-demand pricing for AI training and inference workloads. The self-serve platform makes it easy to provision GPU capacity for LLM fine-tuning, distributed training, and model deployment without enterprise contracts. A straightforward on-demand GPU cloud for startups and research teams that need H100 access at competitive rates.
- Competitive H100 pricing
- Spot availability
- Flexible billing
- Wide GPU selection
Live GPU Pricing
Region Coverage
Popular Comparisons
AWS — hyperscaler provider
AWS offers on-demand, reserved, and spot GPU instances across EC2 P4d (A100), P5 (H100), and G6 (L40S) families, spanning 30+ global regions with enterprise SLAs and deep ML tooling via SageMaker. H100 and A100 clusters are available with InfiniBand networking for distributed LLM training and large-scale AI inference. The broadest ecosystem of any GPU cloud provider, making it the default choice for enterprises already invested in the AWS stack.
Corelink — specialist provider
Corelink is a GPU cloud offering H100, H200, A100, and L40S instances with flexible billing, spot availability, and competitive on-demand pricing for AI training and inference workloads. The self-serve platform makes it easy to provision GPU capacity for LLM fine-tuning, distributed training, and model deployment without enterprise contracts. A straightforward on-demand GPU cloud for startups and research teams that need H100 access at competitive rates.
Billing model comparison
AWS uses a On-demand, Reserved (1yr/3yr), Spot billing model with a minimum commitment of None (on-demand). Corelink uses On-demand, Spot billing with a None minimum. AWS's no-commitment on-demand model is more flexible for short-term or experimental workloads, while Corelink's commitment requirement suits teams with predictable long-running jobs.
Which workloads each provider suits best
AWS is best suited for: Enterprise workloads, Production ML inference, Teams already on AWS. Its key strengths are widest global region coverage, deep ecosystem integrations, enterprise slas. Corelink is best suited for: Cost-sensitive AI training, Spot-tolerant workloads, Startups needing H100 access. Its key strengths are competitive h100 pricing, spot availability, flexible billing. As a hyperscaler, AWS offers broader ecosystem integration and compliance certifications at a premium price. Corelink as a specialist provider typically offers lower per-GPU rates for teams that don't need the full hyperscaler ecosystem.
Support tiers and region coverage
AWS offers Basic → Enterprise support across 5 regions (us-east-1, us-west-2, eu-west-1 and 2 more). Corelink offers Community → Standard support across 1 region (US). AWS's broader region footprint gives it an advantage for latency-sensitive workloads or teams with data residency requirements in specific geographies.
Provider background: AWS vs Corelink
AWS was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Seattle, WA. Corelink was founded in 2023 and is headquartered in United States. AWS has 17 years more operational history than Corelink, which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.