Beam vs SKT (Haein Cluster): GPU Compute Price Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of GPU compute pricing, regions, billing models, and strengths for Beam and SKT (Haein Cluster). Updated July 2026.
Provider Overview
Strengths & Best For
Beam is a serverless GPU platform that lets developers deploy AI models and run H100, A100, and T4 compute jobs with automatic scaling and per-second pay-per-use billing — no infrastructure management required. A Python-native SDK and fast cold starts make it easy to build and ship LLM inference APIs, batch ML pipelines, and AI model serving endpoints quickly. A strong choice for Python-first teams that want serverless GPU infrastructure with predictable, usage-based pricing.
- Serverless model
- Auto-scaling
- Simple SDK
- Fast cold starts
SK Telecom's Haein Cluster is a large-scale H100 GPU cluster in South Korea, purpose-built for Korean enterprise AI training and research institution workloads at hyperscale. Telco-grade reliability and Korean data residency make it the premier domestic GPU cloud option for South Korean enterprises with strict data sovereignty requirements. A strong choice for Korean organizations running large-scale LLM training and distributed AI workloads that need to keep data within South Korea.
- Large-scale Korean cluster
- Telco-grade reliability
- Korean enterprise focus
Live GPU Pricing
Region Coverage
Popular Comparisons
Beam — specialist provider
Beam is a serverless GPU platform that lets developers deploy AI models and run H100, A100, and T4 compute jobs with automatic scaling and per-second pay-per-use billing — no infrastructure management required. A Python-native SDK and fast cold starts make it easy to build and ship LLM inference APIs, batch ML pipelines, and AI model serving endpoints quickly. A strong choice for Python-first teams that want serverless GPU infrastructure with predictable, usage-based pricing.
SKT (Haein Cluster) — hyperscaler provider
SK Telecom's Haein Cluster is a large-scale H100 GPU cluster in South Korea, purpose-built for Korean enterprise AI training and research institution workloads at hyperscale. Telco-grade reliability and Korean data residency make it the premier domestic GPU cloud option for South Korean enterprises with strict data sovereignty requirements. A strong choice for Korean organizations running large-scale LLM training and distributed AI workloads that need to keep data within South Korea.
Billing model comparison
Beam uses a Per-second usage billing model with a minimum commitment of None. SKT (Haein Cluster) uses Reserved / On-demand billing with a Varies minimum. Both providers offer flexible billing options — compare the live pricing table above to find the best rate for your specific GPU model and workload duration.
Which workloads each provider suits best
Beam is best suited for: Serverless AI inference, Batch processing, Python-first teams. Its key strengths are serverless model, auto-scaling, simple sdk. SKT (Haein Cluster) is best suited for: Korean enterprises, Large-scale training, APAC AI workloads. Its key strengths are large-scale korean cluster, telco-grade reliability, korean enterprise focus. As a specialist provider, Beam typically offers lower per-GPU rates for teams that don't need the full hyperscaler ecosystem. SKT (Haein Cluster) as a hyperscaler offers broader ecosystem integration and compliance certifications at a premium.
Support tiers and region coverage
Beam offers Standard support across 1 region (US). SKT (Haein Cluster) offers Enterprise support across 1 region (KR). Both providers have comparable region coverage — choose based on which specific regions overlap with your user base or data residency requirements.
Provider background: Beam vs SKT (Haein Cluster)
Beam was founded in 2022 and is headquartered in New York, NY. SKT (Haein Cluster) was founded in 2023 and is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea. Beam has 1 years more operational history than SKT (Haein Cluster), which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.