Compute Comparison
vs
All providers →

Cleura vs TensorWave: Pricing, Specs, Strengths & Weaknesses

Side-by-side comparison of GPU compute pricing, regions, billing models, and strengths for Cleura and TensorWave. Rates sourced from public APIs — verify current availability and billing terms before purchasing.

Overview

Provider type
Specialist
Specialist
Founded
2020
2023
Headquarters
Stockholm, Sweden
Phoenix, AZ
Billing model
On-demand
On-demand, Reserved
Min commitment
None
None
Support tier
Standard
Standard → Enterprise
Regions
2 regions
1 regions

Strengths & Best For

Cleura

Cleura is a European sovereign cloud provider offering GPU compute with full GDPR compliance, EU data sovereignty, and a sustainability focus across Swedish and EU data centers. Built on OpenStack, Cleura gives enterprises full control over their cloud environment with no vendor lock-in. On-demand billing and a commitment to renewable energy make it a responsible choice for European enterprises running AI workloads with strict data residency and ESG requirements.

Strengths
  • GDPR compliance and EU data sovereignty
  • OpenStack-based — no vendor lock-in
  • Renewable energy infrastructure
  • Swedish and EU data centers
Weaknesses
  • Very small GPU catalog — limited to A-series
  • Limited to European regions
  • Not ML-focused — limited AI tooling
Best For
European enterprises with GDPR requirementsOrganizations needing OpenStack-compatible cloudSustainable AI workloads in the EU
Visit Cleura
Cleura Rating

No reviews yet — add yours ↗

TensorWave

TensorWave specializes in AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X GPU instances — the highest-memory GPU accelerators available in any cloud — offering a compelling NVIDIA alternative for large-model LLM inference and distributed AI training via the ROCm ecosystem. On-demand and reserved billing options are available from US-based data centers, with competitive pricing relative to equivalent NVIDIA H100 configurations. The go-to on-demand GPU cloud for teams exploring AMD ROCm or needing massive VRAM for large-context inference.

Strengths
  • AMD MI300X/MI325X — highest VRAM in any cloud
  • NVIDIA alternative via ROCm ecosystem
  • Competitive pricing vs equivalent H100 configs
  • Large-context inference capability
Weaknesses
  • AMD ROCm ecosystem less mature than CUDA
  • Smaller provider — limited scale vs hyperscalers
  • Fewer regions — US-only
Best For
AMD ROCm workloadsLarge-model inference needing maximum VRAMTeams exploring NVIDIA alternatives
Visit TensorWave
TensorWave Rating

No reviews yet — add yours ↗

Live GPU Pricing

Live prices load below.

Region Coverage

Popular Comparisons

Key differences

Cleura

European sovereign cloud — GDPR, Swedish data centers, renewable energy

TensorWave

AMD MI300X and MI325X GPU cloud — highest-VRAM accelerators for large-model inference

AttributeCleuraTensorWave
Provider typespecialistspecialist
Billing modelOn-demandOn-demand, Reserved
Min commitmentNoneNone
Regions2 (SE, EU)1 (US-West)
Support tierStandardStandard → Enterprise
Best forEuropean enterprises with GDPR requirements, Organizations needing OpenStack-compatible cloudAMD ROCm workloads, Large-model inference needing maximum VRAM
Founded / HQ2020 · Stockholm, Sweden2023 · Phoenix, AZ