FluidStack vs Koyeb: GPU Compute Price Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of GPU compute pricing, regions, billing models, and strengths for FluidStack and Koyeb. Updated July 2026.
Provider Overview
Strengths & Best For
FluidStack aggregates H100, A100, and consumer GPU capacity from data centers across the US and EU, offering competitive bulk pricing and flexible contracts for AI training and LLM fine-tuning workloads. Spot GPU rental is available alongside on-demand and reserved options, making it a cost-effective choice for teams with variable compute needs. A strong pick for EU-based teams wanting broad GPU availability without committing to a single provider.
- Competitive pricing
- EU/US coverage
- Spot availability
- Flexible contracts
Koyeb is a serverless GPU platform for deploying AI inference endpoints without managing infrastructure, with automatic scaling to zero and pay-per-use billing across EU and US regions. Git-based deployment and a simple dashboard make it easy to ship LLM inference APIs and AI model serving endpoints in minutes. A strong choice for teams that want zero-ops GPU inference with automatic scaling and no idle compute costs.
- Serverless — no infrastructure management
- Automatic scaling to zero
- EU and US regions
- Git-based deployment
Live GPU Pricing
Region Coverage
Popular Comparisons
FluidStack — specialist provider
FluidStack aggregates H100, A100, and consumer GPU capacity from data centers across the US and EU, offering competitive bulk pricing and flexible contracts for AI training and LLM fine-tuning workloads. Spot GPU rental is available alongside on-demand and reserved options, making it a cost-effective choice for teams with variable compute needs. A strong pick for EU-based teams wanting broad GPU availability without committing to a single provider.
Koyeb — specialist provider
Koyeb is a serverless GPU platform for deploying AI inference endpoints without managing infrastructure, with automatic scaling to zero and pay-per-use billing across EU and US regions. Git-based deployment and a simple dashboard make it easy to ship LLM inference APIs and AI model serving endpoints in minutes. A strong choice for teams that want zero-ops GPU inference with automatic scaling and no idle compute costs.
Billing model comparison
FluidStack uses a On-demand, Spot, Reserved billing model with a minimum commitment of None. Koyeb uses Pay-per-use (serverless) billing with a None minimum. Both providers offer flexible billing options — compare the live pricing table above to find the best rate for your specific GPU model and workload duration.
Which workloads each provider suits best
FluidStack is best suited for: Cost-sensitive training, EU-based teams, Flexible workloads. Its key strengths are competitive pricing, eu/us coverage, spot availability. Koyeb is best suited for: Inference API deployments, Serverless AI apps, Teams wanting zero-ops GPU. Its key strengths are serverless — no infrastructure management, automatic scaling to zero, eu and us regions. Both providers target similar workload profiles — the live pricing table above is the most reliable way to determine which offers better value for your specific GPU model and region requirements.
Support tiers and region coverage
FluidStack offers Standard → Enterprise support across 4 regions (US-East, US-West, EU-West and 1 more). Koyeb offers Community → Standard support across 2 regions (EU, US). FluidStack's broader region footprint gives it an advantage for latency-sensitive workloads or teams with data residency requirements in specific geographies.
Provider background: FluidStack vs Koyeb
FluidStack was founded in 2019 and is headquartered in London, UK. Koyeb was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Paris, France. FluidStack has 2 years more operational history than Koyeb, which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.