Baidu ERNIE vs Modal: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence
Full comparison of Baidu ERNIE and Modal — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Rates sourced from public APIs — verify before use.
Baidu ERNIE
ERNIE 5 — Baidu's frontier Chinese-English bilingual LLM API
Baidu ERNIE is the LLM API from Baidu, China's largest search company. The ERNIE 5 series includes ERNIE-5.1 (balanced) and ERNIE-5.0 (frontier), both optimised for Chinese-English bilingual tasks, knowledge retrieval, and enterprise applications. Pricing is in USD via the international API.
Modal
Managed inference API — 10 shared-endpoint models with per-token pricing
Modal Shared Endpoints serve a fixed catalog of models from Modal-managed pools. Modal manages the hardware and autoscaling, and usage is billed per token. Shared Endpoints have model-specific concurrency limits on concurrent in-flight requests. Prices are published rates from modal.com/docs/guide/supported-models.md, re-read 2026-10-31.
Key metric comparison
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Live token pricing
Strengths and weaknesses
Baidu ERNIE
Modal
Key differentiators
ERNIE 5 is the leading Chinese-English bilingual LLM API, backed by Baidu's search knowledge graph — the go-to choice for applications targeting Chinese-language users.
Modal Shared Endpoints provide managed per-token inference on a fixed 10-model catalog with published cached-input pricing and no infrastructure to manage.
Frequently asked questions
Baidu ERNIE FAQs
What is ERNIE?
ERNIE (Enhanced Representation through Knowledge Integration) is Baidu's LLM series. ERNIE 5 is the current generation, with ERNIE-5.1 (balanced) and ERNIE-5.0 (frontier) available via the Wenxin Qianfan API.
How much does the ERNIE API cost?
ERNIE-5.1 is $0.56/$2.53 per 1M input/output tokens. ERNIE-5.0 is $1.40/$5.60 per 1M tokens. See the Baidu Cloud pricing page for current rates.
Is ERNIE good for English tasks?
ERNIE 5 handles English competently but is primarily optimised for Chinese. For English-only workloads, frontier Western models typically outperform ERNIE. For Chinese or bilingual Chinese-English tasks, ERNIE is among the strongest options available.
Modal FAQs
What models does Modal offer on Shared Endpoints?
Modal Shared Endpoints currently serve 10 models: GLM 5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, Muse Spark Open, GLM 5.3, Inkling NVFP4, Qwen3.8-Max, Qwen3.8-Max VL, and Kimi K3. Use the model table above for per-model pricing and capability details. Source: Modal's published Shared Endpoints catalog, re-read 2026-10-31.
How much does Modal charge per 1M tokens?
Modal Shared Endpoints input prices range from $0.15/1M (GLM 5.3 Flash NVFP4) to $3.00/1M (Kimi K3). All models include cached-input pricing. See the model table for full per-model rates.
Does Modal offer prompt caching?
Yes. All 10 models in the Modal Shared Endpoints catalog have published cached-input pricing, ranging from $0.005/1M (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017) to $0.30/1M (Kimi K3). Depending on the model, the cached-input rate is 77.5% to 98% below the standard input rate. Source: Modal's published Shared Endpoints rates, re-read 2026-10-31.
Provider resources
Baidu ERNIE — ERNIE 5 — Baidu's frontier Chinese-English bilingual LLM API
Baidu ERNIE is the LLM API from Baidu, China's largest search company. The ERNIE 5 series includes ERNIE-5.1 (balanced) and ERNIE-5.0 (frontier), both optimised for Chinese-English bilingual tasks, knowledge retrieval, and enterprise applications. Pricing is in USD via the international API.
ERNIE 5 is the leading Chinese-English bilingual LLM API, backed by Baidu's search knowledge graph — the go-to choice for applications targeting Chinese-language users.
Modal — Managed inference API — 10 shared-endpoint models with per-token pricing
Modal Shared Endpoints serve a fixed catalog of models from Modal-managed pools. Modal manages the hardware and autoscaling, and usage is billed per token. Shared Endpoints have model-specific concurrency limits on concurrent in-flight requests. Prices are published rates from modal.com/docs/guide/supported-models.md, re-read 2026-10-31.
Modal Shared Endpoints provide managed per-token inference on a fixed 10-model catalog with published cached-input pricing and no infrastructure to manage.
Key strengths compared
Baidu ERNIE
- Strong Chinese-English bilingual performance — best-in-class for Chinese language tasks
- Deep integration with Baidu Search knowledge graph
- ERNIE-5.1 at $0.56/$2.53 per 1M tokens is competitive for a frontier-tier bilingual model
- Primarily optimised for Chinese — English performance trails frontier Western models
- Limited ecosystem outside China; fewer third-party integrations
Modal
- Managed hardware and autoscaling — no infrastructure to operate
- Published per-token rates including cached-input pricing
- OpenAI-style per-token billing across all 10 models
- Small fixed catalog of 10 models
- Model-specific concurrency limits on shared pools
Key weaknesses compared
Baidu ERNIE
- Primarily optimised for Chinese — English performance trails frontier Western models
- Limited ecosystem outside China; fewer third-party integrations
- Documentation and support primarily in Chinese
Modal
- Small fixed catalog of 10 models
- Model-specific concurrency limits on shared pools
- Prices are published rates re-read 2026-10-31, not continuously collected
Provider category context
Baidu ERNIE is a frontier lab, founded in 2000. Modal is a inference api. Baidu ERNIE as a frontier lab trains and serves its own proprietary models. Modal as an inference API provider hosts open-weight models — typically offering lower prices for equivalent capability tiers but without access to proprietary frontier models.
How to choose between them
Choose Baidu ERNIE if you need Chinese NLP. Choose Modal if you need managed hardware and autoscaling — no infrastructure to operate. For high-volume production workloads, run a cost comparison using the token pricing table above with your actual prompt/completion token ratio — the cheapest provider depends heavily on your input-to-output token ratio.