Compute Comparison
vs
All providers →

Baseten vs Hyperbolic: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence

Full comparison of Baseten and Hyperbolic — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Rates sourced from public APIs — verify before use.

Baseten

Production ML infrastructure — deploy any model with custom serving, autoscaling, and GPU selection

Baseten is a production ML infrastructure platform for deploying custom and open-weight models with full control over serving configuration, GPU selection, autoscaling, and cold-start behavior. Unlike managed inference APIs, Baseten lets you bring your own model weights, custom preprocessing, and serving logic. It supports Truss (Baseten's open-source model packaging format), vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, and custom Python serving code. Ideal for teams that need more control than a managed API but less overhead than raw Kubernetes.

Custom model deploymentFine-tuned modelsML infrastructureProduction servingOpen-weight models
Open-weight hostHosts open weights

Hyperbolic

GPU marketplace + inference API — Llama 4, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and H100/H200 on-demand

Hyperbolic operates both a GPU marketplace and a serverless inference API. The inference catalog has expanded in 2026 to include Llama 4 Scout/Maverick, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3, and Qwen3 alongside the existing Llama 3.x and DeepSeek R1 lineup. The GPU marketplace offers H100 and H200 instances at spot-market rates, making Hyperbolic a dual-purpose platform for both managed inference and raw compute.

Cost-efficiencyGPU computeResearchOpen-sourcePrototypingBudget production
Open-weight hostHosts open weights

Key metric comparison

Cheapest input ($/1M)

—

$0.10

Cheapest output ($/1M)

—

$0.10

Peak throughput

—

300 tok/s

Best latency (TTFT)

—

220ms

Intelligence score

—

83/100

Context window

—

131K

Live token pricing

Basetenlive pricing

No live pricing data available.

Hyperboliclive pricing

← Swipe to see all columns

ModelInputOutput
meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct$0.40EST Jul 2026$0.40
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1$0.50EST Jul 2026$2.00
meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct$0.10EST Jul 2026$0.10
Qwen/Qwen3-235B-A22B$0.30EST Jul 2026$0.30

Strengths and weaknesses

Baseten

Full control over model serving: custom preprocessing, postprocessing, and business logic
Bring your own weights — deploy any HuggingFace model or custom fine-tune
GPU selection: H100, A100, A10G, T4 with per-second billing
Autoscaling including scale-to-zero for cost efficiency
Truss open-source packaging format for reproducible model deployments
More setup required than managed APIs — not a drop-in OpenAI replacement
Cold starts on scale-to-zero deployments (configurable warm pool available)
Pricing is higher than shared inference APIs for low-volume workloads

Hyperbolic

GPU marketplace: H100 and H200 at spot-market rates
Expanded 2026 inference catalog: Llama 4, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3, Qwen3
Among the lowest per-token prices for open-weight inference
Dual-purpose: managed inference API + raw GPU compute
OpenAI-compatible API
Good for research, prototyping, and cost-sensitive production
Less established reliability than larger providers
Throughput lower than Groq/Cerebras for speed-critical apps
No fine-tuning support

Key differentiators

Baseten

The production ML platform that gives you managed-API convenience with custom-serving flexibility — deploy any model with your own preprocessing logic, GPU selection, and autoscaling without managing Kubernetes.

Hyperbolic

A provider combining a GPU marketplace (H100/H200 spot pricing) with a broad open-weight inference API — covering both managed inference and raw compute from a single platform.

Frequently asked questions

Baseten FAQs

What is Baseten?

Baseten is a production ML infrastructure platform for deploying AI models with custom serving logic, GPU selection, and autoscaling. It supports any open-weight model or custom fine-tune via the Truss packaging format.

How does Baseten differ from Together AI or Replicate?

Baseten gives you full control over the serving stack — custom preprocessing, postprocessing, GPU selection, and autoscaling behavior. Together AI and Replicate are managed APIs with fixed serving; Baseten is for teams that need custom model serving logic.

What GPUs does Baseten support?

Baseten supports H100 SXM, H100 PCIe, A100 80GB, A10G, and T4 GPUs with per-second billing. You select the GPU type per deployment based on your model's memory and throughput requirements.

Hyperbolic FAQs

What models does Hyperbolic offer in 2026?

Hyperbolic hosts Llama 4 Scout and Maverick, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3, Qwen3, Llama 3.3 70B, DeepSeek R1, and other popular open-weight models. The catalog is updated frequently as new models are released.

Does Hyperbolic offer GPU compute as well as inference?

Yes. Hyperbolic operates a GPU marketplace offering H100 and H200 instances at spot-market rates. This makes it a dual-purpose platform for teams that need both managed inference and raw GPU access.

How does Hyperbolic pricing compare to competitors?

Hyperbolic is among the most affordable options for open-weight model inference, often undercutting Together AI and Fireworks AI on price. GPU marketplace rates are competitive with other spot GPU providers.

Provider resources

Key strengths compared

Baseten

  • Full control over model serving: custom preprocessing, postprocessing, and business logic
  • Bring your own weights — deploy any HuggingFace model or custom fine-tune
  • GPU selection: H100, A100, A10G, T4 with per-second billing
  • More setup required than managed APIs — not a drop-in OpenAI replacement
  • Cold starts on scale-to-zero deployments (configurable warm pool available)

Hyperbolic

  • GPU marketplace: H100 and H200 at spot-market rates
  • Expanded 2026 inference catalog: Llama 4, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3, Qwen3
  • Among the lowest per-token prices for open-weight inference
  • Less established reliability than larger providers
  • Throughput lower than Groq/Cerebras for speed-critical apps

Key weaknesses compared

Baseten

  • More setup required than managed APIs — not a drop-in OpenAI replacement
  • Cold starts on scale-to-zero deployments (configurable warm pool available)
  • Pricing is higher than shared inference APIs for low-volume workloads

Hyperbolic

  • Less established reliability than larger providers
  • Throughput lower than Groq/Cerebras for speed-critical apps
  • No fine-tuning support

Provider category context

Baseten is a inference api, founded in 2019. Hyperbolic is a inference api, founded in 2023. Both are inference api providers — the comparison is primarily about pricing, model selection, and feature differentiation within the same tier.

How to choose between them

Both Baseten and Hyperbolic host open-weight models. The key differentiators are latency, throughput, and which specific model versions each provider offers. Check the speed metrics above — inference API providers often differ significantly on tokens-per-second for the same model. Pricing is typically competitive between them; availability of specific model versions (e.g., Llama 3.1 405B, DeepSeek V3) may be the deciding factor.