Compute Comparison
vs
All providers →

Deep Infra vs Meta: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence

Full comparison of Deep Infra and Meta — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Updated July 2026.

Deep Infra

The cheapest inference API for open-weight models — Llama, Mistral, and more

Deep Infra is an inference-focused API provider specialising in open-weight models at extremely competitive prices. Consistently among the cheapest providers for Llama 3, Mistral, and DeepSeek models, making it the go-to choice for cost-sensitive production inference.

Cost-sensitive inferenceLlama 3 productionDeepSeek hostingHigh-volume batch processing
Open-weight hostHosts open weights

Meta

Llama 4 & Muse Spark — the world's most widely deployed open-weight models

Meta AI is the creator of the Llama model family, the most widely used open-weight LLMs in the world. Llama models are available via Meta's own API and through dozens of third-party inference providers. The Llama 4 series includes Behemoth (2T params), Scout, and Maverick, with 1M-token context windows. Meta also offers Muse Spark, a proprietary multimodal model. Because Llama weights are open, teams can self-host on GPU cloud for dramatically lower per-token costs at scale.

Self-hosted inferenceCost-optimised at scaleEdge/on-deviceChatVisionCoding
Proprietary modelsHosts open weights

Key metrics

Cheapest input ($/1M)

Cheapest output ($/1M)

Peak throughput

Best latency (TTFT)

Intelligence score

Context window

Live token pricing

Strengths & weaknesses

Deep Infra

Consistently lowest prices for open-weight models
Wide model catalog including Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek
OpenAI-compatible API
Fast cold start times
No rate limits on most models
No proprietary models — open-weight only
Less enterprise support than larger providers
Smaller ecosystem than Together AI or Fireworks

Meta

Open-weight models — self-host on any GPU cloud for lowest per-token cost at scale
Llama 4 Behemoth: 2T parameter frontier model with 1M context window
Widest third-party hosting ecosystem — available on AWS, Azure, GCP, Together AI, Groq, and 20+ others
Llama 3.2 1B/3B models run on-device (mobile, edge)
No vendor lock-in — switch inference providers without changing model weights
Self-hosting requires GPU infrastructure expertise
Meta's own API has limited availability vs third-party hosts
Llama 4 Behemoth pricing not yet publicly listed
Smaller proprietary model lineup vs OpenAI/Anthropic

Key differentiators

Deep Infra

The most price-competitive inference API for open-weight models — often 30–50% cheaper than comparable providers for the same Llama or Mistral model.

Meta

The only frontier-class model family available as open weights — enabling self-hosted inference on GPU cloud at a fraction of API pricing for high-volume workloads.

Frequently asked questions

Deep Infra FAQs

How cheap is Deep Infra compared to other providers?

Deep Infra is consistently among the cheapest providers for open-weight models. For example, Llama 3.1 8B is available at $0.02–0.05/1M tokens, and Llama 3.3 70B at around $0.10/1M tokens — often 30–50% below comparable providers.

What models does Deep Infra support?

Deep Infra hosts a wide range of open-weight models including the full Llama 3.x family, Mistral, Mixtral, DeepSeek V3 and R1, Qwen, and many others. The catalog is updated frequently as new models are released.

Is Deep Infra OpenAI-compatible?

Yes. Deep Infra provides an OpenAI-compatible API, so you can use the OpenAI SDK by pointing it at the Deep Infra endpoint. This makes migration straightforward.

Meta FAQs

What is the Llama 4 context window?

Llama 4 Scout and Maverick support 1,000,000-token (1M) context windows. Llama 4 Behemoth also targets 1M context. This makes Llama 4 competitive with Gemini 1.5 Pro for long-document and multi-document tasks.

How much does the Meta Llama API cost?

Llama 3.2 1B is $0.02/1M tokens in/out. Llama 3.2 3B is $0.03/$0.05. Llama 3.1 8B is $0.02/$0.05. Llama 3.2 90B Vision is $1.20/$1.20. Muse Spark 1.1 is $1.25/$4.25. Llama 4 Behemoth pricing is not yet publicly listed.

Can I self-host Llama models?

Yes — all Llama 3.x and Llama 4 Scout/Maverick weights are publicly available under the Llama Community License. You can run them on any GPU cloud provider. A single H100 at ~$2.50/hr can serve Llama 3.1 8B at very high throughput, making self-hosting cost-effective above ~10M tokens/day.

Provider resources

Deep InfraThe cheapest inference API for open-weight models — Llama, Mistral, and more

Deep Infra is an inference-focused API provider specialising in open-weight models at extremely competitive prices. Consistently among the cheapest providers for Llama 3, Mistral, and DeepSeek models, making it the go-to choice for cost-sensitive production inference.

The most price-competitive inference API for open-weight models — often 30–50% cheaper than comparable providers for the same Llama or Mistral model.

MetaLlama 4 & Muse Spark — the world's most widely deployed open-weight models

Meta AI is the creator of the Llama model family, the most widely used open-weight LLMs in the world. Llama models are available via Meta's own API and through dozens of third-party inference providers. The Llama 4 series includes Behemoth (2T params), Scout, and Maverick, with 1M-token context windows. Meta also offers Muse Spark, a proprietary multimodal model. Because Llama weights are open, teams can self-host on GPU cloud for dramatically lower per-token costs at scale.

The only frontier-class model family available as open weights — enabling self-hosted inference on GPU cloud at a fraction of API pricing for high-volume workloads.

Key strengths compared

Deep Infra

  • Consistently lowest prices for open-weight models
  • Wide model catalog including Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek
  • OpenAI-compatible API

Meta

  • Open-weight models — self-host on any GPU cloud for lowest per-token cost at scale
  • Llama 4 Behemoth: 2T parameter frontier model with 1M context window
  • Widest third-party hosting ecosystem — available on AWS, Azure, GCP, Together AI, Groq, and 20+ others

Provider category context

Deep Infra is a inference api, founded in 2023. Meta is a open source host, founded in 2023. The category difference means these providers serve partially overlapping use cases — compare the model lists and pricing tables above to find the best fit for your specific workload.

How to choose between them

Choose Deep Infra if you need consistently lowest prices for open-weight models. Choose Meta if you need open-weight models — self-host on any gpu cloud for lowest per-token cost at scale. For high-volume production workloads, run a cost comparison using the token pricing table above with your actual prompt/completion token ratio — the cheapest provider depends heavily on your input-to-output token ratio.