Compute Comparison
vs
All providers →

DeepSeek vs Fireworks AI: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence

Full comparison of DeepSeek and Fireworks AI — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Updated July 2026.

DeepSeek

Chinese frontier lab — DeepSeek V3 and R1 at remarkably low prices

DeepSeek is a Chinese AI lab that has released highly capable open-weight models at prices far below Western competitors. DeepSeek V3 matches GPT-4 class performance at $0.27/1M input tokens, while DeepSeek R1 is a reasoning model competitive with o1 at a fraction of the cost. Both models are open-weight.

Cost-efficiencyReasoningCodingOpen-sourceSelf-hosting
Proprietary models

Fireworks AI

Production-grade open-source inference with fast cold starts

Fireworks AI provides optimised inference for open-weight models with a focus on production reliability and low latency. They host Llama, DeepSeek R1, and other popular open-source models with competitive per-token pricing and a serverless deployment model that minimises cold-start times.

ProductionReasoningSpeedOpen-sourceCoding
Open-weight hostHosts open weights

Key metrics

Cheapest input ($/1M)

Cheapest output ($/1M)

Peak throughput

Best latency (TTFT)

Intelligence score

Context window

Live token pricing

Strengths & weaknesses

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3 matches GPT-4 class at $0.27/1M input — 10× cheaper
R1 reasoning model competitive with o1 at a fraction of the cost
Both V3 and R1 are open-weight — can be self-hosted
Mixture-of-Experts architecture for efficient inference
Strong coding and math benchmarks
Data residency in China — may not meet compliance requirements
API reliability can lag Western providers during peak demand
Limited multimodal capability vs. Gemini or GPT-4o

Fireworks AI

320+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — fast GPU inference
DeepSeek R1 hosting with strong reasoning capability
Production-grade reliability with SLAs
Serverless with minimal cold-start times
OpenAI-compatible API
Smaller model catalog than Together AI
No fine-tuning on standard plans
Slightly higher pricing than budget alternatives

Key differentiators

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3 delivers GPT-4 class intelligence at $0.27/1M input tokens — the most disruptive price-to-performance ratio in the LLM market.

Fireworks AI

Production-grade reliability with 320+ tokens/sec throughput and DeepSeek R1 reasoning at $3/1M input — a strong balance of speed and capability.

Frequently asked questions

DeepSeek FAQs

How much does DeepSeek cost?

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.27/1M input and $1.10/1M output tokens — roughly 10× cheaper than GPT-4o for comparable capability. DeepSeek R1 is $0.55/1M input and $2.19/1M output.

Is DeepSeek open-weight?

Yes. Both DeepSeek V3 and DeepSeek R1 are open-weight models available on Hugging Face. You can self-host them on your own GPU infrastructure, though they require significant compute (671B parameters for R1).

How does DeepSeek R1 compare to OpenAI o1?

DeepSeek R1 scores comparably to OpenAI o1 on math and coding benchmarks at a fraction of the cost. R1 is open-weight and can be self-hosted, while o1 is proprietary. R1 is available via multiple inference providers including Fireworks AI and Together AI.

Fireworks AI FAQs

What models does Fireworks AI offer?

Fireworks AI hosts Llama 3.3 70B, DeepSeek R1, Mixtral, and other popular open-weight models. They focus on production-ready models with optimised inference rather than the broadest possible catalog.

How much does Fireworks AI cost?

Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.90/1M tokens (input and output). DeepSeek R1 is $3.00/1M input and $8.00/1M output. Pricing is competitive with other inference API providers.

How does Fireworks AI compare to Together AI?

Fireworks AI offers faster throughput (320 vs 190 tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B) and stronger production reliability. Together AI has a larger model catalog and fine-tuning support. Choose Fireworks for production speed, Together for model variety.

Provider resources

DeepSeekChinese frontier lab — DeepSeek V3 and R1 at remarkably low prices

DeepSeek is a Chinese AI lab that has released highly capable open-weight models at prices far below Western competitors. DeepSeek V3 matches GPT-4 class performance at $0.27/1M input tokens, while DeepSeek R1 is a reasoning model competitive with o1 at a fraction of the cost. Both models are open-weight.

DeepSeek V3 delivers GPT-4 class intelligence at $0.27/1M input tokens — the most disruptive price-to-performance ratio in the LLM market.

Fireworks AIProduction-grade open-source inference with fast cold starts

Fireworks AI provides optimised inference for open-weight models with a focus on production reliability and low latency. They host Llama, DeepSeek R1, and other popular open-source models with competitive per-token pricing and a serverless deployment model that minimises cold-start times.

Production-grade reliability with 320+ tokens/sec throughput and DeepSeek R1 reasoning at $3/1M input — a strong balance of speed and capability.

Key strengths compared

DeepSeek

  • DeepSeek V3 matches GPT-4 class at $0.27/1M input — 10× cheaper
  • R1 reasoning model competitive with o1 at a fraction of the cost
  • Both V3 and R1 are open-weight — can be self-hosted

Fireworks AI

  • 320+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — fast GPU inference
  • DeepSeek R1 hosting with strong reasoning capability
  • Production-grade reliability with SLAs

Provider category context

DeepSeek is a frontier lab, founded in 2023. Fireworks AI is a inference api, founded in 2022. DeepSeek as a frontier lab trains and serves its own proprietary models. Fireworks AI as an inference API provider hosts open-weight models — typically offering lower prices for equivalent capability tiers but without access to proprietary frontier models.

How to choose between them

Choose DeepSeek if you need deepseek v3 matches gpt-4 class at $0.27/1m input — 10× cheaper. Choose Fireworks AI if you need 320+ tokens/sec on llama 3.3 70b — fast gpu inference. For high-volume production workloads, run a cost comparison using the token pricing table above with your actual prompt/completion token ratio — the cheapest provider depends heavily on your input-to-output token ratio.