Compute Comparison
vs
All providers →

Google vs Anthropic: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence

Full comparison of Google and Anthropic — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Updated July 2026.

Google

Gemini 2.5 — the largest context window at the lowest frontier price

Google DeepMind's Gemini family offers some of the most competitive frontier pricing, with Gemini 2.5 Pro delivering top-tier intelligence at $1.25/1M input tokens. The 1M+ token context window is the largest available. Gemini 2.5 Flash is a standout efficient model for vision and multimodal tasks.

VisionLong-contextCodingMultimodalCost-efficiency
Proprietary models

Anthropic

Claude — safety-focused frontier AI with exceptional coding ability

Anthropic builds the Claude model family, known for long context windows (up to 200K tokens), strong coding performance, and a safety-first design philosophy. Claude 4 Opus and Sonnet lead on many coding and reasoning benchmarks. Prompt caching is available at significant discounts.

CodingReasoningLong-contextChatAgents
Proprietary models

Key metrics

Cheapest input ($/1M)

Cheapest output ($/1M)

Peak throughput

Best latency (TTFT)

Intelligence score

Context window

Live token pricing

Strengths & weaknesses

Google

1M+ token context window — largest available
Best price-per-intelligence at frontier tier ($1.25/1M input)
Native multimodal: text, image, audio, video
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the best efficient vision model
Free tier available via Google AI Studio
No open-weight models
Complex tiered pricing based on context length
API reliability has historically lagged OpenAI

Anthropic

Top coding benchmark scores (Claude 4 Opus)
200K context window on all Claude models
Aggressive prompt caching — up to 90% discount
Strong instruction-following and safety alignment
Extended thinking / reasoning mode on Opus
No open-weight models — full vendor lock-in
Opus is the most expensive frontier model at $15/$75 per 1M tokens
No native image generation capability

Key differentiators

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro delivers frontier-tier intelligence at $1.25/1M input tokens — the best price-to-performance ratio among all frontier models.

Anthropic

Claude 4 Opus scores highest on coding benchmarks among all frontier models, with a 200K context window and aggressive prompt caching.

Frequently asked questions

Google FAQs

How much does the Google Gemini API cost?

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/1M input tokens (up to 200K context) and $10/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $0.15/$0.60 per 1M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash is even cheaper at $0.10/$0.40 per 1M tokens.

What is the context window for Gemini models?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Flash both support a 1,048,576-token (1M+) context window — the largest available from any major LLM provider. This makes them ideal for processing entire codebases, books, or long document collections.

Does Gemini support vision and multimodal inputs?

Yes. All Gemini 2.x models natively support images, audio, and video inputs alongside text. Gemini 2.5 Flash is particularly strong for vision tasks at a low cost.

Anthropic FAQs

How much does the Anthropic Claude API cost?

Claude 4 Opus costs $15/1M input and $75/1M output tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3/$15 per 1M tokens. Claude Haiku 3.5 is the budget option at $0.80/$4.00. Prompt caching reduces input costs by up to 90%.

What is the context window for Claude models?

All Claude models support a 200,000-token context window, making them ideal for processing long documents, codebases, or multi-turn conversations without truncation.

How does Anthropic prompt caching work?

Anthropic's prompt caching lets you mark portions of your prompt (system prompts, documents, tool definitions) to be cached server-side. Cached tokens are billed at 10% of the standard input price after the first write, making repeated long-context calls dramatically cheaper.

Provider resources