Compute Comparison
Frontier LabOpen WeightsProprietary Models

Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash — plus Veo 3.1 video, Lyria 3.5 music, and Gemini Omni

Google DeepMind's Gemini 3.x family spans Gemini 3.8 Flash (latest, promotional pricing until Dec 31 2026), Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. The platform has expanded far beyond text: Veo 3.1 for video generation, Lyria 3.5 for music generation, Gemini Omni for video generation, and Gemini Embedding 2 for multimodal embeddings. Gemma 4 open-weight models are free via the API. Check the live table for current per-token rates.

A wide multimodal AI API — text, image, video (Veo 3.1), music (Lyria 3.5), speech, transcription, and robotics under one key, with Gemini 3.8 Flash at promotional pricing until end of 2026.

Music generationCost-efficiency
Google Models
26
Google Cheapest Input
$0.04
per 1M tokens
Google Max Throughput
600 t/s
Google Min Latency
80ms
TTFT p50
Google Best Intelligence
94/100
Google Vision Models
21
Google Strengths
  • Gemini 3.8 Flash: promotional pricing until Dec 31 2026 — check live table for current rates
  • Wide multimodal API: text, image, audio, video generation, music, speech, transcription
  • Veo 3.1 video generation (720p/1080p/4K)
  • Gemma 4 open-weight models free via API
  • Free tier via Google AI Studio for prototyping
  • Google Search grounding: 5,000 free requests/month on Gemini 3.x
Google Weaknesses
  • Promotional pricing expires Jan 1 2027 — prices double
  • Complex tiered pricing based on context length (≤200K vs >200K)
  • API reliability has historically lagged OpenAI
Google Model Tiers
frontier
7
advanced
3
efficient
4
budget
12
Google Capabilities
Vision21
Tool Use19
Reasoning2
Open Weights8
Multilingual0
RAG / Search2
Structured Out3
Embeddings2
Google Intelligence vs Pricelog scale
frontieradvancedefficientbudget
Google Throughput (tokens/sec)
Google Input vs Output Pricing ($/1M tokens)
InputOutput
Google Context Window (tokens)
Google Best Model by Use Case
coding
gemini-4-argon
frontier$2.00/1M in
reasoning
gemini-4-argon
frontier$2.00/1M in
vision
gemini-4-argon
frontier$2.00/1M in
chat
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
frontier$2.00/1M in
cost
gemma-4-26b
budget$0.00/1M in
speed
gemma-3-1b
budget$0.00/1M in
long-context
gemini-4-argon
frontier$2.00/1M in
self-hosted
gemma-4-26b
budget$0.00/1M in
embedding
text-embedding-004
budget$0.00/1M in
search
text-embedding-004
budget$0.00/1M in
quality
gemini-embedding-exp-03-07
budget$0.00/1M in
image-generation
imagen-4
frontier$0.00/1M in
video-generation
veo-3
frontier$0.00/1M in

Google Models

Sort by:
← swipe to scroll →
ModelModalityTierPriceCached /1MTTFTThroughputContextIntel.Caps
gemma-4-26b
Gemma 4
Chatbudget
—
No current price available
—250ms200 t/s256K
73
gemma-4-e2b
Gemma 4
Chatbudget
—
No current price available
—120ms400 t/s128K
58
gemma-4-e4b
Gemma 4
Chatbudget
—
No current price available
—140ms350 t/s128K
62
gemma-3-4b
Gemma 3
Chatbudget
—
No current price available
—130ms380 t/s128K
55
gemma-3-1b
Gemma 3
Chatbudget
—
No current price available
—80ms600 t/s32K
42
text-embedding-004
Google Embeddings
Embeddingbudget
—
No current price available
—100ms0 t/s2K
0
gemini-embedding-exp-03-07
Gemini Embeddings
Embeddingbudget
—
No current price available
—120ms0 t/s8K
0
imagen-4
Imagen
Imagefrontier
$0.04
per image
EST Jul 2026
—6.0s0 t/s4K
0
imagen-4-ultra
Imagen
Imagefrontier
$0.08
per image
EST Jul 2026
—9.0s0 t/s4K
0
veo-3
Veo
Videofrontier
$0.35
per second
EST Jul 2026
—30.0s0 t/s4K
0
veo-2
Veo
Videoadvanced
$0.20
per second
EST Jul 2026
—25.0s0 t/s4K
0
gemma-3-12b-it
Gemma 3
Chatbudget
$0.04/ $0.08
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—180ms400 t/s131K
52
gemini-1.5-flash
Gemini 1.5
Chatbudget
$0.07/ $0.30
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
$0.02200ms350 t/s1.0M
58
gemini-2.0-flash-lite
Gemini 2.0
Chatbudget
$0.07/ $0.30
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—180ms400 t/s1.0M
50
gemini-2.0-flash
Gemini 2.0
Chatbudget
$0.10/ $0.40
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—250ms280 t/s1.0M
60
gemma-3-27b-it
Gemma 3
Chatefficient
$0.10/ $0.20
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—300ms220 t/s131K
62
gemma-4-31b
Gemma 4
Chatefficient
$0.14/ $0.40
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—280ms180 t/s256K
76
gemini-2.5-flash
Gemini 2.5
Chatefficient
$0.15/ $0.60
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
$0.04350ms220 t/s1.0M
72
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Gemini 3.1
Chatbudget
$0.25/ $1.50
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—200ms280 t/s1.0M
75
gemini-3-flash-preview
Gemini 3
Chatefficient
$0.50/ $3.00
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—300ms200 t/s1.0M
82
gemini-2.5-pro
Gemini 2.5
Chatfrontier
$1.25/ $10.00
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
$0.31900ms90 t/s1.0M
87
gemini-1.5-pro
Gemini 1.5
Chatadvanced
$1.25/ $5.00
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
$0.31800ms100 t/s2.1M
74
gemini-3.5-flash
Gemini 3.5
Chatadvanced
$1.50/ $9.00
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—400ms160 t/s1.0M
87
gemini-3-pro-preview
Gemini 3
Chatfrontier
$2.00/ $12.00
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—700ms100 t/s1.0M
91
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Gemini 3.1
Chatfrontier
$2.00/ $12.00
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—750ms95 t/s1.0M
92
gemini-4-argon
Gemini 4
Chatfrontier
$2.00/ $10.00
in / out per 1M
EST Oct 2026
—900ms90 t/s1.0M
94

Google — Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Google Reviews

Loading reviews...

All LLM Providers

Full comparison table

Google LLM pricing overview

Google is a proprietary AI lab that develops and hosts its own large language models. Google DeepMind's Gemini 3.x family spans Gemini 3.8 Flash (latest, promotional pricing until Dec 31 2026), Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. The platform has expanded far beyond text: Veo 3.1 for video generation, Lyria 3.5 for music generation, Gemini Omni for video generation, and Gemini Embedding 2 for multimodal embeddings. Gemma 4 open-weight models are free via the API. Check the live table for current per-token rates. Common use cases include Vision, Long-context, Coding, Multimodal. Headquartered in Mountain View, CA, founded 1998. All models are accessible via a REST API compatible with standard OpenAI-style request formats, enabling drop-in integration with most LLM frameworks and orchestration tools.

Google vs other LLM providers

Google competes with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Groq, Together AI, Mistral, Cohere, and other inference API providers across dimensions of price, throughput, latency, context window, and model intelligence. A wide multimodal AI API — text, image, video (Veo 3.1), music (Lyria 3.5), speech, transcription, and robotics under one key, with Gemini 3.8 Flash at promotional pricing until end of 2026. Use the LLM provider comparison tool to see Google token pricing, latency, and throughput side-by-side with any other provider. The full LLM pricing table shows all providers ranked by input token cost, output token cost, and throughput in a single sortable view.

Why choose Google?

Google stands out because: A wide multimodal AI API — text, image, video (Veo 3.1), music (Lyria 3.5), speech, transcription, and robotics under one key, with Gemini 3.8 Flash at promotional pricing until end of 2026.. The API currently offers 26 models, spanning 7 frontier, 3 advanced, 4 efficient, 12 budget tiers. For teams running high-volume inference workloads, prompt caching and batch API endpoints can reduce effective input token costs by 50–90% — check the context window cost guide for a full breakdown of caching economics.

Understanding Google token pricing

Google charges separately for input (prompt) and output (completion) tokens, priced per 1M tokens in USD. Output tokens are typically 3–5× more expensive than input tokens due to the compute cost of autoregressive generation. The cheapest {meta.name} input rate is currently $0.04/1M tokens. Prices shown are sourced from Google's public pricing page and updated every 15 minutes. Need help estimating your spend? Read the LLM API cost calculator guide — it covers tokens, context windows, prompt caching, and batch discounts with worked examples for RAG, chat history, and document processing workloads.

Google context window and model capabilities

Context window size directly affects both capability and cost — every token in the context window is charged as an input token. Google's largest context window is 2.1M tokens. For RAG and document processing workloads, longer context windows enable richer retrieval but increase per-call costs proportionally. Prompt caching — where supported — stores the KV state of repeated prefixes and charges 75–90% less for cache hits, making it the most impactful cost optimization for applications with consistent system prompts or retrieved documents. See the LLM context window cost guide for a full analysis of how context length affects your API bill.

Self-hosted vs managed inference: when Google makes sense

Managed inference APIs like Google eliminate infrastructure overhead — no GPU provisioning, driver management, or model serving stack to maintain. The trade-off is cost at scale: a single H100 at ~$2.50/hr can serve ~500K tokens/min of Llama 3.3 70B, which at Google API rates would cost significantly more per token. The break-even point depends on your request volume, latency requirements, and engineering capacity. For teams processing fewer than ~10M tokens/day, managed APIs are almost always cheaper when total cost of ownership is considered. Above that threshold, self-hosted inference on rented GPU compute typically wins on unit economics. Read the cheapest GPU cloud guide for a full break-even analysis. Historical Google token price data is available in the LLM price history charts.

Compare Google With Another LLM Provider

Compare Google vs other providers

Side-by-side token pricing, latency, throughput, and context window. View all LLM provider comparisons →

Looking for alternatives?

Compare Google with other LLM API providers side by side.

Google alternatives