Compute Comparison

Groq vs Modal: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence

Full comparison of Groq and Modal — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Rates sourced from public APIs — verify before use.

Groq

LPU + LPX inference — high-throughput tokens per second, $350M Series A

Groq runs custom Language Processing Units (LPUs) and the newer LPX chips that work alongside NVIDIA next-generation GPUs for high-throughput inference. Groq raised a $350M Series A in 2026 and is building hundreds of megawatts of capacity. Check listed rates and provider documentation for current model availability and throughput figures.

SpeedReal-time chatVoice AICost-efficiencyBatch processing
Open-weight hostHosts open weights

Modal

Managed inference API — 10 shared-endpoint models with per-token pricing

Modal Shared Endpoints serve a fixed catalog of models from Modal-managed pools. Modal manages the hardware and autoscaling, and usage is billed per token. Shared Endpoints have model-specific concurrency limits on concurrent in-flight requests. Prices are published rates from modal.com/docs/guide/supported-models.md, re-read 2026-10-31.

InferenceCost-efficiencyOpen-sourceChat
Open-weight hostHosts open weights

Key metric comparison

Cheapest input ($/1M)

—

—

Cheapest output ($/1M)

—

—

Peak throughput

—

—

Best latency (TTFT)

—

—

Intelligence score

—

—

Context window

—

—

Live token pricing

Strengths and weaknesses

Groq

750+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — high-throughput GPU-class inference (Groq-published)
Sub-100ms time-to-first-token for real-time applications
LPX chips alongside LPUs for expanded capacity
Very competitive pricing on open-weight models
OpenAI-compatible API
Free tier available
Limited model selection vs. Together AI or Fireworks
No vision model support on most models
No fine-tuning capability

Modal

Managed hardware and autoscaling — no infrastructure to operate
Published per-token rates including cached-input pricing
OpenAI-style per-token billing across all 10 models
Cached-input pricing available on every model in the catalog
Small fixed catalog of 10 models
Model-specific concurrency limits on shared pools
Prices are published rates re-read 2026-10-31, not continuously collected

Key differentiators

Groq

Groq's custom LPU/LPX chips deliver high-throughput inference significantly faster than conventional GPU systems, backed by $350M in Series A funding and hundreds of megawatts of planned capacity.

Modal

Modal Shared Endpoints provide managed per-token inference on a fixed 10-model catalog with published cached-input pricing and no infrastructure to manage.

Frequently asked questions

Groq FAQs

How fast is Groq inference?

Groq delivers 750+ tokens/second on Llama 3.3 70B and 1,200+ tokens/second on Llama 3.1 8B using custom LPU/LPX chips, making it well-suited for real-time and low-latency applications.

What is Groq's LPX chip?

The LPX is Groq's next-generation inference chip, introduced alongside the existing LPU lineup. It expands Groq's capacity and enables even higher throughput for large-scale deployments.

How much does Groq cost?

Groq uses per-token pricing across its model catalog. Check console.groq.com/docs/openai for current rates on Llama 3.3 70B, Llama 3.1 8B, and other models.

Modal FAQs

What models does Modal offer on Shared Endpoints?

Modal Shared Endpoints currently serve 10 models: GLM 5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, Muse Spark Open, GLM 5.3, Inkling NVFP4, Qwen3.8-Max, Qwen3.8-Max VL, and Kimi K3. Use the model table above for per-model pricing and capability details. Source: Modal's published Shared Endpoints catalog, re-read 2026-10-31.

How much does Modal charge per 1M tokens?

Modal Shared Endpoints input prices range from $0.15/1M (GLM 5.3 Flash NVFP4) to $3.00/1M (Kimi K3). All models include cached-input pricing. See the model table for full per-model rates.

Does Modal offer prompt caching?

Yes. All 10 models in the Modal Shared Endpoints catalog have published cached-input pricing, ranging from $0.005/1M (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017) to $0.30/1M (Kimi K3). Depending on the model, the cached-input rate is 77.5% to 98% below the standard input rate. Source: Modal's published Shared Endpoints rates, re-read 2026-10-31.

Provider resources

Groq — LPU + LPX inference — high-throughput tokens per second, $350M Series A

Groq runs custom Language Processing Units (LPUs) and the newer LPX chips that work alongside NVIDIA next-generation GPUs for high-throughput inference. Groq raised a $350M Series A in 2026 and is building hundreds of megawatts of capacity. Check listed rates and provider documentation for current model availability and throughput figures.

Groq's custom LPU/LPX chips deliver high-throughput inference significantly faster than conventional GPU systems, backed by $350M in Series A funding and hundreds of megawatts of planned capacity.

Modal — Managed inference API — 10 shared-endpoint models with per-token pricing

Modal Shared Endpoints serve a fixed catalog of models from Modal-managed pools. Modal manages the hardware and autoscaling, and usage is billed per token. Shared Endpoints have model-specific concurrency limits on concurrent in-flight requests. Prices are published rates from modal.com/docs/guide/supported-models.md, re-read 2026-10-31.

Modal Shared Endpoints provide managed per-token inference on a fixed 10-model catalog with published cached-input pricing and no infrastructure to manage.

Key strengths compared

Groq

  • 750+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — high-throughput GPU-class inference (Groq-published)
  • Sub-100ms time-to-first-token for real-time applications
  • LPX chips alongside LPUs for expanded capacity
  • Limited model selection vs. Together AI or Fireworks
  • No vision model support on most models

Modal

  • Managed hardware and autoscaling — no infrastructure to operate
  • Published per-token rates including cached-input pricing
  • OpenAI-style per-token billing across all 10 models
  • Small fixed catalog of 10 models
  • Model-specific concurrency limits on shared pools

Key weaknesses compared

Groq

  • Limited model selection vs. Together AI or Fireworks
  • No vision model support on most models
  • No fine-tuning capability

Modal

  • Small fixed catalog of 10 models
  • Model-specific concurrency limits on shared pools
  • Prices are published rates re-read 2026-10-31, not continuously collected

Provider category context

Groq is a inference api, founded in 2016. Modal is a inference api. Both are inference api providers — the comparison is primarily about pricing, model selection, and feature differentiation within the same tier.

How to choose between them

Both Groq and Modal host open-weight models. The key differentiators are latency, throughput, and which specific model versions each provider offers. Check the speed metrics above — inference API providers often differ significantly on tokens-per-second for the same model. Pricing is typically competitive between them; availability of specific model versions (e.g., Llama 3.1 405B, DeepSeek V3) may be the deciding factor.