Compute Comparison
vs
All providers →

Modal vs NVIDIA NIM: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence

Full comparison of Modal and NVIDIA NIM — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Rates sourced from public APIs — verify before use.

Modal

Managed inference API — 10 shared-endpoint models with per-token pricing

Modal Shared Endpoints serve a fixed catalog of models from Modal-managed pools. Modal manages the hardware and autoscaling, and usage is billed per token. Shared Endpoints have model-specific concurrency limits on concurrent in-flight requests. Prices are published rates from modal.com/docs/guide/supported-models.md, re-read 2026-10-31.

InferenceCost-efficiencyOpen-sourceChat
Open-weight hostHosts open weights

NVIDIA NIM

Optimized inference microservices for NVIDIA GPUs — deploy any model on your own hardware

NVIDIA NIM (NVIDIA Inference Microservices) provides containerized, GPU-optimized inference microservices for deploying LLMs and other AI models on NVIDIA hardware. NIM packages models with TensorRT-LLM optimizations, enabling production-grade throughput on H100, A100, and RTX GPUs. Available via the NVIDIA API catalog for cloud access or as self-hosted containers for on-premises and private cloud deployments.

On-premises deploymentPrivate cloudHigh-throughput inferenceEnterprise AIModel customization
Open-weight hostHosts open weights

Key metric comparison

Cheapest input ($/1M)

—

—

Cheapest output ($/1M)

—

—

Peak throughput

—

—

Best latency (TTFT)

—

—

Intelligence score

—

—

Context window

—

—

Live token pricing

Strengths and weaknesses

Modal

Managed hardware and autoscaling — no infrastructure to operate
Published per-token rates including cached-input pricing
OpenAI-style per-token billing across all 10 models
Cached-input pricing available on every model in the catalog
Small fixed catalog of 10 models
Model-specific concurrency limits on shared pools
Prices are published rates re-read 2026-10-31, not continuously collected

NVIDIA NIM

TensorRT-LLM optimizations deliver maximum throughput on NVIDIA GPUs
Self-hosted deployment option for air-gapped and private cloud environments
Broad model catalog: Llama, Mistral, Qwen, DeepSeek, and NVIDIA-optimized variants
Enterprise SLA and support via NVIDIA AI Enterprise license
Free API access via build.nvidia.com for prototyping
Self-hosted path requires NVIDIA GPU infrastructure investment
Cloud API catalog is primarily for evaluation — production at scale needs on-prem or cloud GPU contracts
Less suited for teams without existing NVIDIA hardware

Key differentiators

Modal

Modal Shared Endpoints provide managed per-token inference on a fixed 10-model catalog with published cached-input pricing and no infrastructure to manage.

NVIDIA NIM

An inference platform that lets you run the same TensorRT-LLM-optimized microservice both on NVIDIA's cloud API and on your own NVIDIA GPU infrastructure with consistent performance characteristics.

Frequently asked questions

Modal FAQs

What models does Modal offer on Shared Endpoints?

Modal Shared Endpoints currently serve 10 models: GLM 5.3 Flash NVFP4, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, Muse Spark Open, GLM 5.3, Inkling NVFP4, Qwen3.8-Max, Qwen3.8-Max VL, and Kimi K3. Use the model table above for per-model pricing and capability details. Source: Modal's published Shared Endpoints catalog, re-read 2026-10-31.

How much does Modal charge per 1M tokens?

Modal Shared Endpoints input prices range from $0.15/1M (GLM 5.3 Flash NVFP4) to $3.00/1M (Kimi K3). All models include cached-input pricing. See the model table for full per-model rates.

Does Modal offer prompt caching?

Yes. All 10 models in the Modal Shared Endpoints catalog have published cached-input pricing, ranging from $0.005/1M (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017) to $0.30/1M (Kimi K3). Depending on the model, the cached-input rate is 77.5% to 98% below the standard input rate. Source: Modal's published Shared Endpoints rates, re-read 2026-10-31.

NVIDIA NIM FAQs

What is NVIDIA NIM?

NVIDIA NIM (Inference Microservices) are containerized AI inference packages optimized for NVIDIA GPUs using TensorRT-LLM. They can be deployed on NVIDIA's cloud API catalog or self-hosted on any NVIDIA GPU infrastructure.

How do I access NVIDIA NIM models?

You can access NIM models via the NVIDIA API catalog at build.nvidia.com — free for prototyping. For production self-hosting, NIM containers are available through NVIDIA AI Enterprise licensing.

What models does NVIDIA NIM support?

NIM supports a broad catalog including Llama 4, Mistral, Qwen3, DeepSeek V3/R1, Nemotron, and NVIDIA's own optimized model variants. The catalog grows with each major open-weight model release.

Provider resources

Modal — Managed inference API — 10 shared-endpoint models with per-token pricing

Modal Shared Endpoints serve a fixed catalog of models from Modal-managed pools. Modal manages the hardware and autoscaling, and usage is billed per token. Shared Endpoints have model-specific concurrency limits on concurrent in-flight requests. Prices are published rates from modal.com/docs/guide/supported-models.md, re-read 2026-10-31.

Modal Shared Endpoints provide managed per-token inference on a fixed 10-model catalog with published cached-input pricing and no infrastructure to manage.

NVIDIA NIM — Optimized inference microservices for NVIDIA GPUs — deploy any model on your own hardware

NVIDIA NIM (NVIDIA Inference Microservices) provides containerized, GPU-optimized inference microservices for deploying LLMs and other AI models on NVIDIA hardware. NIM packages models with TensorRT-LLM optimizations, enabling production-grade throughput on H100, A100, and RTX GPUs. Available via the NVIDIA API catalog for cloud access or as self-hosted containers for on-premises and private cloud deployments.

An inference platform that lets you run the same TensorRT-LLM-optimized microservice both on NVIDIA's cloud API and on your own NVIDIA GPU infrastructure with consistent performance characteristics.

Key strengths compared

Modal

  • Managed hardware and autoscaling — no infrastructure to operate
  • Published per-token rates including cached-input pricing
  • OpenAI-style per-token billing across all 10 models
  • Small fixed catalog of 10 models
  • Model-specific concurrency limits on shared pools

NVIDIA NIM

  • TensorRT-LLM optimizations deliver maximum throughput on NVIDIA GPUs
  • Self-hosted deployment option for air-gapped and private cloud environments
  • Broad model catalog: Llama, Mistral, Qwen, DeepSeek, and NVIDIA-optimized variants
  • Self-hosted path requires NVIDIA GPU infrastructure investment
  • Cloud API catalog is primarily for evaluation — production at scale needs on-prem or cloud GPU contracts

Key weaknesses compared

Modal

  • Small fixed catalog of 10 models
  • Model-specific concurrency limits on shared pools
  • Prices are published rates re-read 2026-10-31, not continuously collected

NVIDIA NIM

  • Self-hosted path requires NVIDIA GPU infrastructure investment
  • Cloud API catalog is primarily for evaluation — production at scale needs on-prem or cloud GPU contracts
  • Less suited for teams without existing NVIDIA hardware

Provider category context

Modal is a inference api. NVIDIA NIM is a inference api, founded in 2024. Both are inference api providers — the comparison is primarily about pricing, model selection, and feature differentiation within the same tier.

How to choose between them

Both Modal and NVIDIA NIM host open-weight models. The key differentiators are latency, throughput, and which specific model versions each provider offers. Check the speed metrics above — inference API providers often differ significantly on tokens-per-second for the same model. Pricing is typically competitive between them; availability of specific model versions (e.g., Llama 3.1 405B, DeepSeek V3) may be the deciding factor.