Runway vs Voyage AI: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence
Full comparison of Runway and Voyage AI — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Rates sourced from public APIs — verify before use.
Runway
Gen-4 video generation API — cinematic quality text-to-video and image-to-video
Runway is a creative AI company best known for its Gen series of video generation models. Gen-4 and Gen-4 Turbo are available via API, producing cinematic-quality video from text or image prompts. Runway is widely used in professional film and advertising production. Pricing is per second of generated video.
Voyage AI
Voyage 3.5 — strong MTEB retrieval quality for RAG and semantic search
Voyage AI specialises in embedding and reranking models for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and semantic search. Voyage 3.5 and its variants rank highly on the MTEB leaderboard for retrieval quality. The 2026 lineup adds Voyage 3.5 Lite (cost-efficient), Voyage Code 3 (code-optimised embeddings), and Voyage Multimodal 3 (image + text embeddings). Voyage AI is the default embedding provider for Anthropic's Claude documentation and many production RAG systems. Check voyageai.com for current rates.
Key metric comparison
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Live token pricing
Strengths and weaknesses
Runway
Voyage AI
Key differentiators
Gen-4 is Runway's cinematic-quality video generation model, trusted by professional film and advertising studios — with Gen-4 Turbo offering a faster, lower-cost alternative via the same API.
Voyage 3.5 Lite delivers strong MTEB retrieval quality at cost-efficient pricing — with specialised variants for code and multimodal content.
Frequently asked questions
Runway FAQs
How is Runway priced?
Runway charges per second of generated video. Gen-4 is $0.100/second and Gen-4 Turbo is $0.050/second. See runwayml.com/pricing for current rates.
What is Gen-4?
Gen-4 is Runway's latest video generation model, producing cinematic-quality output from text or image prompts. It is used in professional film, advertising, and visual effects production.
What is the difference between Gen-4 and Gen-4 Turbo?
Gen-4 produces higher-quality output at $0.100/second. Gen-4 Turbo is faster and cheaper at $0.050/second, with slightly lower quality. Both support text-to-video and image-to-video generation.
Voyage AI FAQs
What is Voyage AI used for?
Voyage AI provides embedding and reranking models for RAG pipelines, semantic search, and document retrieval. It does not offer chat or text generation models — it is purpose-built for the retrieval layer of AI applications.
How does Voyage AI compare to OpenAI embeddings?
Voyage 3.5 consistently scores well on MTEB benchmarks relative to OpenAI text-embedding-3-large, often at lower per-token cost. Check voyageai.com and openai.com/api/pricing for current rates to compare.
What is Voyage Code 3?
Voyage Code 3 is a code-optimised embedding model designed for code search and retrieval. It outperforms general-purpose embeddings on code-related retrieval tasks, making it the preferred choice for code search applications.
Provider resources
Runway — Gen-4 video generation API — cinematic quality text-to-video and image-to-video
Runway is a creative AI company best known for its Gen series of video generation models. Gen-4 and Gen-4 Turbo are available via API, producing cinematic-quality video from text or image prompts. Runway is widely used in professional film and advertising production. Pricing is per second of generated video.
Gen-4 is Runway's cinematic-quality video generation model, trusted by professional film and advertising studios — with Gen-4 Turbo offering a faster, lower-cost alternative via the same API.
Voyage AI — Voyage 3.5 — strong MTEB retrieval quality for RAG and semantic search
Voyage AI specialises in embedding and reranking models for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and semantic search. Voyage 3.5 and its variants rank highly on the MTEB leaderboard for retrieval quality. The 2026 lineup adds Voyage 3.5 Lite (cost-efficient), Voyage Code 3 (code-optimised embeddings), and Voyage Multimodal 3 (image + text embeddings). Voyage AI is the default embedding provider for Anthropic's Claude documentation and many production RAG systems. Check voyageai.com for current rates.
Voyage 3.5 Lite delivers strong MTEB retrieval quality at cost-efficient pricing — with specialised variants for code and multimodal content.
Key strengths compared
Runway
- Gen-4 produces cinematic-quality video used in professional film and advertising
- Gen-4 Turbo at $0.050/second offers faster generation at lower cost
- Strong motion quality and temporal consistency
- Video generation only — no text, image, or audio LLM models
- Gen-4 at $0.100/second is among the higher-priced video generation APIs
Voyage AI
- Voyage 3.5 ranks highly on MTEB retrieval benchmarks
- Voyage 3.5 Lite: cost-efficient embedding option
- Voyage Code 3 for code-optimised embeddings
- Embeddings and reranking only — no chat or generation models
- Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI
Key weaknesses compared
Runway
- Video generation only — no text, image, or audio LLM models
- Gen-4 at $0.100/second is among the higher-priced video generation APIs
- Generation latency is higher than text inference
Voyage AI
- Embeddings and reranking only — no chat or generation models
- Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI
- No open-weight models
Provider category context
Runway is a frontier lab, founded in 2018. Voyage AI is a inference api, founded in 2023. Runway as a frontier lab trains and serves its own proprietary models. Voyage AI as an inference API provider hosts open-weight models — typically offering lower prices for equivalent capability tiers but without access to proprietary frontier models.
How to choose between them
Choose Runway if you need Professional video production. Choose Voyage AI if you need voyage 3.5 ranks highly on mteb retrieval benchmarks. For high-volume production workloads, run a cost comparison using the token pricing table above with your actual prompt/completion token ratio — the cheapest provider depends heavily on your input-to-output token ratio.