Compute Comparison
DeepSeek/DeepSeek V3EfficientOpen WeightsSupported

deepseek-chat

codingchatcost
deepseek-chat Pricing per 1M tokens
Input$0.270
Output$1.10
Cached input$0.070
View DeepSeek
Context Window
66K
tokens
deepseek-chat Max Output
8K
tokens
deepseek-chat Throughput
90
tokens/sec
deepseek-chat Latency P50
600ms
time to first token
deepseek-chat Parameters
671B
Parameters
About deepseek-chat

deepseek-chat is a efficient-tier language model from DeepSeek with 671B parameters. deepseek-chat is an open-weights model, meaning the weights are publicly available for self-hosting, fine-tuning, and deployment on your own infrastructure — not just through DeepSeek's API. DeepSeek is a Chinese AI lab's open-weights model family, known for competitive performance at very low API prices — particularly strong on coding and math benchmarks.

deepseek-chat is priced at $0.27/1M input tokens and $1.1/1M output tokens. Output tokens are 4.1× more expensive than input tokens — this ratio reflects the sequential nature of autoregressive generation, which requires a separate forward pass per output token versus parallel processing of all input tokens simultaneously. At a typical usage pattern of 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per call, deepseek-chat costs approximately $0.82 per 1,000 API calls. Prompt caching reduces repeated input tokens to $0.07/1M — a 74% discount that compounds significantly for applications with long shared system prompts, multi-turn conversations, or document Q&A where the same context is reused across many queries.

Its 66K-token context window is sufficient for most production use cases, handling documents up to ~25,000 words or multi-turn conversations spanning dozens of exchanges. Median latency (P50 time-to-first-token) is approximately 600ms — suitable for interactive applications where sub-second response is acceptable. Throughput is approximately 90 tokens/second — adequate for streaming at comfortable reading speed. Maximum output length is 8K tokens — adequate for most generation tasks including essays, code functions, and detailed responses.

deepseek-chat is best suited to coding, chat, cost. Supported capabilities include function calling / tool use for agentic workflows, streaming token output for real-time UIs. Function calling support makes it suitable for building AI agents, structured data extraction pipelines, and any workflow requiring the model to invoke external APIs or return typed JSON. When evaluating this model for a specific workload, the most important factors are: context window (does your input fit?), output price (how long are your generations?), and latency (is this interactive or batch?). The pricing table above shows how deepseek-chat compares to similar models across these dimensions.

deepseek-chat sits in the efficient tier — optimized for speed and cost while maintaining solid quality, ideal for high-volume or latency-sensitive workloads. As an open-weights model, deepseek-chat can be self-hosted on GPU compute (see the GPU rental comparison on this site) to eliminate per-token API costs entirely — the break-even point versus API pricing depends on your volume and the GPU hourly rate. When comparing deepseek-chat to alternatives, use the similar models section on this page to find models at comparable price points with different capability tradeoffs. The intelligence score (74/100) reflects aggregate benchmark performance — a useful proxy for general capability, though real-world performance varies significantly by task type. Always test with your specific prompts and use case before committing to a model for production.

deepseek-chat Intelligence Score
74/100
74

Composite quality score based on reasoning, coding, and instruction-following benchmarks.

deepseek-chat Pricing vs Efficient Tier
CheapestThis modelMost expensive
$0.030$0.270$1.50

Input price vs 217 efficient models tracked. Avg: $0.321/1M.

Benchmark Scores3 categories

Industry-standard benchmarks grouped by capability. Higher is better. Hover a row for benchmark description.

Reasoningavg 72
GPQA Diamond59/100
MMLU88/100
LiveBench68/100
Codingavg 61
Coding (HumanEval / SWE composite)82/100
SWE-bench Verified49/100
Terminal-Bench (CLI)52/100
Agenticavg 9
AutoBench (Work Automation)9/100
HLEHumanity's Last Exam
GPQAGraduate-level science Q&A
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues (agentic coding)
OSWorldGUI task completion on real desktop
BrowseCompComplex web research via agentic browsing
MMMUMultimodal college-level reasoning
ChartQAChart and figure understanding
DocVQADocument visual question answering
deepseek-chat Capabilities
Vision / Images✗
Function Calling✓
Streaming✓
Prompt Caching✓
Reasoning / CoT✗
Open Weights✓
Computer Use✗
Web Search✗
deepseek-chat Full Specifications
Model IDdeepseek-chat
ProviderDeepSeek
Model FamilyDeepSeek V3
TierEfficient
Context Window65,536 tokens (66K)
Max Output Tokens8,192 tokens
Input Price$0.27 / 1M tokens
Output Price$1.1 / 1M tokens
Cached Input Price$0.07 / 1M tokens
Throughput90 tokens/sec
Latency (P50)600ms
Intelligence Score74/100
LiveBench Score68/100
Cost per Task (LiveBench)$0.08
Data ConfidenceSupported
HLE Score—
GPQA Diamond59/100
SWE-bench Score49/100
OSWorld Score—
BrowseComp Score—
Terminal-Bench Score52/100
AutoBench Score9/100
Parameters671B
Vision SupportNo
Function CallingYes
StreamingYes
Reasoning ModelNo
Open WeightsYes
Data SourceStatic (verified)
Last Updated2026-07-20

Similar Models by Intelligence Score

deepseek-chat Frequently Asked Questions