fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b is a efficient-tier language model from fal.ai with 141B parameters. fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b is an open-weights model, meaning the weights are publicly available for self-hosting, fine-tuning, and deployment on your own infrastructure — not just through fal.ai's API. The WizardLM family is fal.ai's model series for this capability tier.
fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b is priced at $0.5/1M input tokens and $0.5/1M output tokens. Output tokens are 1× more expensive than input tokens — this ratio reflects the sequential nature of autoregressive generation, which requires a separate forward pass per output token versus parallel processing of all input tokens simultaneously. At a typical usage pattern of 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per call, fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b costs approximately $0.75 per 1,000 API calls. fal.ai does not publish a prompt caching rate for this model, so repeated long contexts are billed at the standard $0.5/1M input rate.
Its 66K-token context window is sufficient for most production use cases, handling documents up to ~25,000 words or multi-turn conversations spanning dozens of exchanges. Median latency (P50 time-to-first-token) is approximately 500ms — suitable for interactive applications where sub-second response is acceptable. Throughput is approximately 120 tokens/second — adequate for streaming at comfortable reading speed. Maximum output length is 8K tokens — adequate for most generation tasks including essays, code functions, and detailed responses.
fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b is best suited to chat, coding. Supported capabilities include streaming token output for real-time UIs. When evaluating this model for a specific workload, the most important factors are: context window (does your input fit?), output price (how long are your generations?), and latency (is this interactive or batch?). The pricing table above shows how fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b compares to similar models across these dimensions.
fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b sits in the efficient tier — optimized for speed and cost while maintaining solid quality, ideal for high-volume or latency-sensitive workloads. As an open-weights model, fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b can be self-hosted on GPU compute (see the GPU rental comparison on this site) to eliminate per-token API costs entirely — the break-even point versus API pricing depends on your volume and the GPU hourly rate. When comparing fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b to alternatives, use the similar models section on this page to find models at comparable price points with different capability tradeoffs. The intelligence score (55/100) reflects aggregate benchmark performance — a useful proxy for general capability, though real-world performance varies significantly by task type. Always test with your specific prompts and use case before committing to a model for production.
Composite quality score based on reasoning, coding, and instruction-following benchmarks.
Input price vs 217 efficient models tracked. Avg: $0.321/1M.
| Model ID | fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b |
| Provider | fal.ai |
| Model Family | WizardLM |
| Tier | Efficient |
| Context Window | 65,536 tokens (66K) |
| Max Output Tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Input Price | $0.5 / 1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.5 / 1M tokens |
| Cached Input Price | Not available |
| Throughput | 120 tokens/sec |
| Latency (P50) | 500ms |
| Intelligence Score | 55/100 |
| LiveBench Score | — |
| Cost per Task (LiveBench) | — |
| Data Confidence | — |
| HLE Score | — |
| GPQA Diamond | — |
| SWE-bench Score | — |
| OSWorld Score | — |
| BrowseComp Score | — |
| Terminal-Bench Score | — |
| AutoBench Score | — |
| Parameters | 141B |
| Vision Support | No |
| Function Calling | No |
| Streaming | Yes |
| Reasoning Model | No |
| Open Weights | Yes |
| Data Source | Static (verified) |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-20 |
Similar Models by Intelligence Score
Self-hosting fal-ai/wizardlm-2-8x22b? These GPUs are well-matched for this model's compute and memory requirements.