llama-3-8b is a budget-tier language model from Meta with 8B parameters. llama-3-8b is an open-weights model, meaning the weights are publicly available for self-hosting, fine-tuning, and deployment on your own infrastructure — not just through Meta's API. Llama 3 is Meta's open-weights model family, available in 8B and 70B sizes — the most widely deployed open-weights models, with strong community support and broad framework compatibility.
llama-3-8b is priced at $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.04/1M output tokens. Output tokens are 1× more expensive than input tokens — this ratio reflects the sequential nature of autoregressive generation, which requires a separate forward pass per output token versus parallel processing of all input tokens simultaneously. At a typical usage pattern of 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per call, llama-3-8b costs approximately $0.06 per 1,000 API calls. Meta does not publish a prompt caching rate for this model, so repeated long contexts are billed at the standard $0.04/1M input rate.
Its 8K-token context window is standard for this tier — adequate for most chat and completion tasks, but may require chunking for long-document workloads. Median latency (P50 time-to-first-token) is approximately 110ms — fast enough for real-time interactive applications. Throughput is approximately 450 tokens/second — fast enough to stream responses at reading speed with headroom for concurrent requests. Maximum output length is 4K tokens — adequate for most generation tasks including essays, code functions, and detailed responses.
llama-3-8b is best suited to cost, speed. Supported capabilities include streaming token output for real-time UIs. When evaluating this model for a specific workload, the most important factors are: context window (does your input fit?), output price (how long are your generations?), and latency (is this interactive or batch?). The pricing table above shows how llama-3-8b compares to similar models across these dimensions.
llama-3-8b sits in the budget tier — the most cost-efficient models, best for high-volume simple tasks, classification, extraction, and applications where cost per call is the primary constraint. As an open-weights model, llama-3-8b can be self-hosted on GPU compute (see the GPU rental comparison on this site) to eliminate per-token API costs entirely — the break-even point versus API pricing depends on your volume and the GPU hourly rate. When comparing llama-3-8b to alternatives, use the similar models section on this page to find models at comparable price points with different capability tradeoffs. The intelligence score (46/100) reflects aggregate benchmark performance — a useful proxy for general capability, though real-world performance varies significantly by task type. Always test with your specific prompts and use case before committing to a model for production.
Composite quality score based on reasoning, coding, and instruction-following benchmarks.
Input price vs 119 budget models tracked. Avg: $0.110/1M.
| Model ID | llama-3-8b |
| Provider | Meta |
| Model Family | Llama 3 |
| Tier | Budget |
| Context Window | 8,192 tokens (8K) |
| Max Output Tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Input Price | $0.04 / 1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.04 / 1M tokens |
| Cached Input Price | Not available |
| Throughput | 450 tokens/sec |
| Latency (P50) | 110ms |
| Intelligence Score | 46/100 |
| LiveBench Score | — |
| Cost per Task (LiveBench) | — |
| Data Confidence | — |
| HLE Score | — |
| GPQA Diamond | — |
| SWE-bench Score | — |
| OSWorld Score | — |
| BrowseComp Score | — |
| Terminal-Bench Score | — |
| AutoBench Score | — |
| Parameters | 8B |
| Vision Support | No |
| Function Calling | No |
| Streaming | Yes |
| Reasoning Model | No |
| Open Weights | Yes |
| Data Source | Static (verified) |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-01 |
Similar Models by Intelligence Score
Self-hosting llama-3-8b? These GPUs are well-matched for this model's compute and memory requirements.