Baseten vs Cerebras: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence
Full comparison of Baseten and Cerebras — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Rates sourced from public APIs — verify before use.
Baseten
Production ML infrastructure — deploy any model with custom serving, autoscaling, and GPU selection
Baseten is a production ML infrastructure platform for deploying custom and open-weight models with full control over serving configuration, GPU selection, autoscaling, and cold-start behavior. Unlike managed inference APIs, Baseten lets you bring your own model weights, custom preprocessing, and serving logic. It supports Truss (Baseten's open-source model packaging format), vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, and custom Python serving code. Ideal for teams that need more control than a managed API but less overhead than raw Kubernetes.
Cerebras
CS-4 wafer-scale — high-throughput inference on GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B
Cerebras uses wafer-scale silicon (the CS-4 chip) to deliver high-throughput inference significantly faster than conventional GPU systems. The Developer tier provides self-serve access; Enterprise tier adds production capacity, custom model weights, fine-tuning, and dedicated support. Available on AWS Marketplace, OpenRouter, HuggingFace, and Vercel. Check cerebras.ai/pricing for current rates and any free-credit offers.
Key metric comparison
—
$0.10
—
$0.10
—
4.5K tok/s
—
20ms
—
70/100
—
131K
Live token pricing
Strengths and weaknesses
Baseten
Cerebras
Key differentiators
The production ML platform that gives you managed-API convenience with custom-serving flexibility — deploy any model with your own preprocessing logic, GPU selection, and autoscaling without managing Kubernetes.
Cerebras CS-4 wafer-scale silicon delivers high-throughput inference on GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B — significantly faster than conventional GPU systems, enabling real-time agentic workflows and interactive AI.
Frequently asked questions
Baseten FAQs
What is Baseten?
Baseten is a production ML infrastructure platform for deploying AI models with custom serving logic, GPU selection, and autoscaling. It supports any open-weight model or custom fine-tune via the Truss packaging format.
How does Baseten differ from Together AI or Replicate?
Baseten gives you full control over the serving stack — custom preprocessing, postprocessing, GPU selection, and autoscaling behavior. Together AI and Replicate are managed APIs with fixed serving; Baseten is for teams that need custom model serving logic.
What GPUs does Baseten support?
Baseten supports H100 SXM, H100 PCIe, A100 80GB, A10G, and T4 GPUs with per-second billing. You select the GPU type per deployment based on your model's memory and throughput requirements.
Cerebras FAQs
How fast is Cerebras inference?
Cerebras delivers significantly higher throughput than conventional GPU-based providers on GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B, enabling real-time agentic workflows and interactive AI applications. Check cerebras.ai for current benchmark figures.
What is the Cerebras CS-4 chip?
The CS-4 is Cerebras's latest wafer-scale chip, 58× larger than a GPU. It provides 900,000+ AI cores and massive on-chip SRAM, eliminating the memory bandwidth bottleneck that limits GPU inference speed.
What models does Cerebras support?
Cerebras supports GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B on the Developer tier. Enterprise adds access to all models including production and preview models. Check cerebras.ai/pricing for current rates.
Provider resources
Key strengths compared
Baseten
- Full control over model serving: custom preprocessing, postprocessing, and business logic
- Bring your own weights — deploy any HuggingFace model or custom fine-tune
- GPU selection: H100, A100, A10G, T4 with per-second billing
- More setup required than managed APIs — not a drop-in OpenAI replacement
- Cold starts on scale-to-zero deployments (configurable warm pool available)
Cerebras
- GPT OSS 120B: high-throughput inference on CS-4 wafer-scale silicon
- Qwen 3.8 27B: fast efficient-tier inference
- CS-4 chip: 58× larger than GPUs, purpose-built for AI inference
- Limited model selection vs. Together AI or Fireworks
- No vision or multimodal support
Key weaknesses compared
Baseten
- More setup required than managed APIs — not a drop-in OpenAI replacement
- Cold starts on scale-to-zero deployments (configurable warm pool available)
- Pricing is higher than shared inference APIs for low-volume workloads
Cerebras
- Limited model selection vs. Together AI or Fireworks
- No vision or multimodal support
- No fine-tuning on Developer tier
Provider category context
Baseten is a inference api, founded in 2019. Cerebras is a inference api, founded in 2016. Both are inference api providers — the comparison is primarily about pricing, model selection, and feature differentiation within the same tier.
How to choose between them
Both Baseten and Cerebras host open-weight models. The key differentiators are latency, throughput, and which specific model versions each provider offers. Check the speed metrics above — inference API providers often differ significantly on tokens-per-second for the same model. Pricing is typically competitive between them; availability of specific model versions (e.g., Llama 3.1 405B, DeepSeek V3) may be the deciding factor.