Compute Comparison
Inference APIOpen Weights

Cerebras

CS-4 wafer-scale — high-throughput inference on GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B

Cerebras uses wafer-scale silicon (the CS-4 chip) to deliver high-throughput inference significantly faster than conventional GPU systems. The Developer tier provides self-serve access; Enterprise tier adds production capacity, custom model weights, fine-tuning, and dedicated support. Available on AWS Marketplace, OpenRouter, HuggingFace, and Vercel. Check cerebras.ai/pricing for current rates and any free-credit offers.

Cerebras CS-4 wafer-scale silicon delivers high-throughput inference on GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B — significantly faster than conventional GPU systems, enabling real-time agentic workflows and interactive AI.

Voice AIReal-time chatSpeedStreaming
Cerebras Models
4
Cerebras Cheapest Input
$0.10
per 1M tokens
Cerebras Max Throughput
4.5K t/s
Cerebras Min Latency
20ms
TTFT p50
Cerebras Best Intelligence
70/100
Cerebras Vision Models
1
Cerebras Strengths
  • GPT OSS 120B: high-throughput inference on CS-4 wafer-scale silicon
  • Qwen 3.8 27B: fast efficient-tier inference
  • CS-4 chip: 58× larger than GPUs, purpose-built for AI inference
  • Significantly faster than conventional GPU inference — enables interactive use cases
  • Self-serve Developer tier — check cerebras.ai for current signup offers
  • Available on AWS Marketplace, OpenRouter, HuggingFace, and Vercel
Cerebras Weaknesses
  • Limited model selection vs. Together AI or Fireworks
  • No vision or multimodal support
  • No fine-tuning on Developer tier
Cerebras Model Tiers
frontier
0
advanced
0
efficient
3
budget
1
Cerebras Capabilities
Vision1
Tool Use4
Reasoning1
Open Weights4
Multilingual0
RAG / Search0
Structured Out0
Embeddings0
Cerebras Intelligence vs Pricelog scale
frontieradvancedefficientbudget
Cerebras Throughput (tokens/sec)
Cerebras Input vs Output Pricing ($/1M tokens)
InputOutput
Cerebras Context Window (tokens)
Cerebras Best Model by Use Case
speed
llama-3.1-8b
budget$0.10/1M in
chat
llama-3.3-70b
efficient$0.85/1M in
coding
llama-3.3-70b
efficient$0.85/1M in
cost
llama-3.1-8b
budget$0.10/1M in
vision
llama-4-scout-17b-16e
efficient$0.10/1M in
reasoning
qwen-3-32b
efficient$0.40/1M in

Cerebras Models

Sort by:
← swipe to scroll →
ModelModalityTierPriceCached /1MTTFTThroughputContextIntel.Caps
llama-3.1-8b
Llama 3.1
Chatbudget
$0.10/ $0.10
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—20ms4.5K t/s128K
38
llama-4-scout-17b-16e
Llama 4
Chatefficient
$0.10/ $0.10
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—25ms3.2K t/s131K
68
qwen-3-32b
Qwen3
Chatefficient
$0.40/ $0.40
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—30ms2.8K t/s131K
70
llama-3.3-70b
Llama 3.3
Chatefficient
$0.85/ $1.20
in / out per 1M
EST Jul 2026
—40ms2.1K t/s128K
64

Cerebras — Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Cerebras Reviews

Loading reviews...

All LLM Providers

Full comparison table

Cerebras LLM pricing overview

Cerebras is an inference API provider that hosts open-weight and third-party large language models. Cerebras uses wafer-scale silicon (the CS-4 chip) to deliver high-throughput inference significantly faster than conventional GPU systems. The Developer tier provides self-serve access; Enterprise tier adds production capacity, custom model weights, fine-tuning, and dedicated support. Available on AWS Marketplace, OpenRouter, HuggingFace, and Vercel. Check cerebras.ai/pricing for current rates and any free-credit offers. Common use cases include Voice AI, Real-time chat, Speed, Interactive coding. Headquartered in Sunnyvale, CA, founded 2016. All models are accessible via a REST API compatible with standard OpenAI-style request formats, enabling drop-in integration with most LLM frameworks and orchestration tools.

Cerebras vs other LLM providers

Cerebras competes with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Groq, Together AI, Mistral, Cohere, and other inference API providers across dimensions of price, throughput, latency, context window, and model intelligence. Cerebras CS-4 wafer-scale silicon delivers high-throughput inference on GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B — significantly faster than conventional GPU systems, enabling real-time agentic workflows and interactive AI. Use the LLM provider comparison tool to see Cerebras token pricing, latency, and throughput side-by-side with any other provider. The full LLM pricing table shows all providers ranked by input token cost, output token cost, and throughput in a single sortable view.

Why choose Cerebras?

Cerebras stands out because: Cerebras CS-4 wafer-scale silicon delivers high-throughput inference on GPT OSS 120B and Qwen 3.8 27B — significantly faster than conventional GPU systems, enabling real-time agentic workflows and interactive AI.. The API currently offers 4 models, spanning 3 efficient, 1 budget tiers. For teams running high-volume inference workloads, prompt caching and batch API endpoints can reduce effective input token costs by 50–90% — check the context window cost guide for a full breakdown of caching economics.

Understanding Cerebras token pricing

Cerebras charges separately for input (prompt) and output (completion) tokens, priced per 1M tokens in USD. Output tokens are typically 3–5× more expensive than input tokens due to the compute cost of autoregressive generation. The cheapest {meta.name} input rate is currently $0.10/1M tokens. Prices shown are sourced from Cerebras's public pricing page and updated every 15 minutes. Need help estimating your spend? Read the LLM API cost calculator guide — it covers tokens, context windows, prompt caching, and batch discounts with worked examples for RAG, chat history, and document processing workloads.

Cerebras context window and model capabilities

Context window size directly affects both capability and cost — every token in the context window is charged as an input token. Cerebras's largest context window is 131K tokens. For RAG and document processing workloads, longer context windows enable richer retrieval but increase per-call costs proportionally. Prompt caching — where supported — stores the KV state of repeated prefixes and charges 75–90% less for cache hits, making it the most impactful cost optimization for applications with consistent system prompts or retrieved documents. See the LLM context window cost guide for a full analysis of how context length affects your API bill.

Self-hosted vs managed inference: when Cerebras makes sense

Managed inference APIs like Cerebras eliminate infrastructure overhead — no GPU provisioning, driver management, or model serving stack to maintain. The trade-off is cost at scale: a single H100 at ~$2.50/hr can serve ~500K tokens/min of Llama 3.3 70B, which at Cerebras API rates would cost significantly more per token. The break-even point depends on your request volume, latency requirements, and engineering capacity. For teams processing fewer than ~10M tokens/day, managed APIs are almost always cheaper when total cost of ownership is considered. Above that threshold, self-hosted inference on rented GPU compute typically wins on unit economics. Read the cheapest GPU cloud guide for a full break-even analysis. Historical Cerebras token price data is available in the LLM price history charts.

Compare Cerebras With Another LLM Provider

Compare Cerebras vs other providers

Side-by-side token pricing, latency, throughput, and context window. View all LLM provider comparisons →

Looking for alternatives?

Compare Cerebras with other LLM API providers side by side.

Cerebras alternatives