Compute Comparison
vs
All providers →

Google vs Meta: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence

Full comparison of Google and Meta — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Updated July 2026.

Google

Gemini 2.5 — the largest context window at the lowest frontier price

Google DeepMind's Gemini family offers some of the most competitive frontier pricing, with Gemini 2.5 Pro delivering top-tier intelligence at $1.25/1M input tokens. The 1M+ token context window is the largest available. Gemini 2.5 Flash is a standout efficient model for vision and multimodal tasks.

VisionLong-contextCodingMultimodalCost-efficiency
Proprietary models

Meta

Llama 4 & Muse Spark — the world's most widely deployed open-weight models

Meta AI is the creator of the Llama model family, the most widely used open-weight LLMs in the world. Llama models are available via Meta's own API and through dozens of third-party inference providers. The Llama 4 series includes Behemoth (2T params), Scout, and Maverick, with 1M-token context windows. Meta also offers Muse Spark, a proprietary multimodal model. Because Llama weights are open, teams can self-host on GPU cloud for dramatically lower per-token costs at scale.

Self-hosted inferenceCost-optimised at scaleEdge/on-deviceChatVisionCoding
Proprietary modelsHosts open weights

Key metrics

Cheapest input ($/1M)

Cheapest output ($/1M)

Peak throughput

Best latency (TTFT)

Intelligence score

Context window

Live token pricing

Strengths & weaknesses

Google

1M+ token context window — largest available
Best price-per-intelligence at frontier tier ($1.25/1M input)
Native multimodal: text, image, audio, video
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the best efficient vision model
Free tier available via Google AI Studio
No open-weight models
Complex tiered pricing based on context length
API reliability has historically lagged OpenAI

Meta

Open-weight models — self-host on any GPU cloud for lowest per-token cost at scale
Llama 4 Behemoth: 2T parameter frontier model with 1M context window
Widest third-party hosting ecosystem — available on AWS, Azure, GCP, Together AI, Groq, and 20+ others
Llama 3.2 1B/3B models run on-device (mobile, edge)
No vendor lock-in — switch inference providers without changing model weights
Self-hosting requires GPU infrastructure expertise
Meta's own API has limited availability vs third-party hosts
Llama 4 Behemoth pricing not yet publicly listed
Smaller proprietary model lineup vs OpenAI/Anthropic

Key differentiators

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro delivers frontier-tier intelligence at $1.25/1M input tokens — the best price-to-performance ratio among all frontier models.

Meta

The only frontier-class model family available as open weights — enabling self-hosted inference on GPU cloud at a fraction of API pricing for high-volume workloads.

Frequently asked questions

Google FAQs

How much does the Google Gemini API cost?

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/1M input tokens (up to 200K context) and $10/1M output. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $0.15/$0.60 per 1M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash is even cheaper at $0.10/$0.40 per 1M tokens.

What is the context window for Gemini models?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Flash both support a 1,048,576-token (1M+) context window — the largest available from any major LLM provider. This makes them ideal for processing entire codebases, books, or long document collections.

Does Gemini support vision and multimodal inputs?

Yes. All Gemini 2.x models natively support images, audio, and video inputs alongside text. Gemini 2.5 Flash is particularly strong for vision tasks at a low cost.

Meta FAQs

What is the Llama 4 context window?

Llama 4 Scout and Maverick support 1,000,000-token (1M) context windows. Llama 4 Behemoth also targets 1M context. This makes Llama 4 competitive with Gemini 1.5 Pro for long-document and multi-document tasks.

How much does the Meta Llama API cost?

Llama 3.2 1B is $0.02/1M tokens in/out. Llama 3.2 3B is $0.03/$0.05. Llama 3.1 8B is $0.02/$0.05. Llama 3.2 90B Vision is $1.20/$1.20. Muse Spark 1.1 is $1.25/$4.25. Llama 4 Behemoth pricing is not yet publicly listed.

Can I self-host Llama models?

Yes — all Llama 3.x and Llama 4 Scout/Maverick weights are publicly available under the Llama Community License. You can run them on any GPU cloud provider. A single H100 at ~$2.50/hr can serve Llama 3.1 8B at very high throughput, making self-hosting cost-effective above ~10M tokens/day.

Provider resources

GoogleGemini 2.5 — the largest context window at the lowest frontier price

Google DeepMind's Gemini family offers some of the most competitive frontier pricing, with Gemini 2.5 Pro delivering top-tier intelligence at $1.25/1M input tokens. The 1M+ token context window is the largest available. Gemini 2.5 Flash is a standout efficient model for vision and multimodal tasks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro delivers frontier-tier intelligence at $1.25/1M input tokens — the best price-to-performance ratio among all frontier models.

MetaLlama 4 & Muse Spark — the world's most widely deployed open-weight models

Meta AI is the creator of the Llama model family, the most widely used open-weight LLMs in the world. Llama models are available via Meta's own API and through dozens of third-party inference providers. The Llama 4 series includes Behemoth (2T params), Scout, and Maverick, with 1M-token context windows. Meta also offers Muse Spark, a proprietary multimodal model. Because Llama weights are open, teams can self-host on GPU cloud for dramatically lower per-token costs at scale.

The only frontier-class model family available as open weights — enabling self-hosted inference on GPU cloud at a fraction of API pricing for high-volume workloads.

Key strengths compared

Google

  • 1M+ token context window — largest available
  • Best price-per-intelligence at frontier tier ($1.25/1M input)
  • Native multimodal: text, image, audio, video

Meta

  • Open-weight models — self-host on any GPU cloud for lowest per-token cost at scale
  • Llama 4 Behemoth: 2T parameter frontier model with 1M context window
  • Widest third-party hosting ecosystem — available on AWS, Azure, GCP, Together AI, Groq, and 20+ others

Provider category context

Google is a frontier lab, founded in 1998. Meta is a open source host, founded in 2023. The category difference means these providers serve partially overlapping use cases — compare the model lists and pricing tables above to find the best fit for your specific workload.

How to choose between them

Choose Google if you need 1m+ token context window — largest available. Choose Meta if you need open-weight models — self-host on any gpu cloud for lowest per-token cost at scale. For high-volume production workloads, run a cost comparison using the token pricing table above with your actual prompt/completion token ratio — the cheapest provider depends heavily on your input-to-output token ratio.