Compute Comparison
Google/Gemini 2.5EfficientSupported

gemini-2.5-flash

chatcostvisionspeed
gemini-2.5-flash Pricing per 1M tokens
Input$0.150
Output$0.600
Cached input$0.037
View Google
Context Window
1.0M
tokens
gemini-2.5-flash Max Output
66K
tokens
gemini-2.5-flash Throughput
220
tokens/sec
gemini-2.5-flash Latency P50
350ms
time to first token
About gemini-2.5-flashEditorial

Gemini 2.5 Flash is Google's cost-optimized model in the Gemini 2.5 generation, designed as the workhorse of the Gemini lineup — delivering strong capability at a fraction of Gemini 2.5 Pro's cost, with optional thinking mode for tasks requiring deeper reasoning. It supports a 1M-token context window, vision inputs, audio, video, tool use, and streaming. For most production workloads that don't require frontier-level capability, Gemini 2.5 Flash offers an exceptional cost-to-quality ratio and is Google's recommended default model for new applications.

Gemini 2.5 Flash is priced at $0.15 per million input tokens (non-thinking) and $0.60 per million output tokens. Thinking mode costs $3.50/1M for thinking tokens. At 1,000 input + 500 output tokens per call, it costs approximately $0.00045 per 1,000 API calls in non-thinking mode — among the lowest prices for a capable multimodal model with a 1M-token context window. The combination of low price, large context window, and optional thinking mode makes it unusually versatile: it can serve as a cheap workhorse for simple tasks and a capable reasoner for complex ones, all on the same API endpoint.

Gemini 2.5 Flash's 1M-token context window is the same as Gemini 2.5 Pro, making it well-suited to long-document workloads that would require chunking with smaller-context models. Non-thinking mode latency is approximately 200–400ms TTFT, suitable for interactive applications. Thinking mode adds 5–60 seconds depending on complexity and thinking budget. Throughput is approximately 150 tokens per second in non-thinking mode. Maximum output is 65,536 tokens. The large context window at low cost makes it particularly attractive for document processing pipelines, RAG systems, and any workload where context length is a constraint with smaller models.

Gemini 2.5 Flash is best suited to high-volume workloads requiring moderate-to-strong capability: document summarization, Q&A over long documents, code generation for common patterns, content moderation, multimodal analysis (images, video, audio), and RAG pipelines where the retrieval context is large. Thinking mode makes it suitable for more complex reasoning tasks without switching to a more expensive model. Its multimodal capability is more mature than GPT-4o mini — particularly for video and audio inputs, which GPT-4o mini does not support. For teams on Google's ecosystem (Vertex AI, Google Cloud), it integrates naturally with other Google services.

Gemini 2.5 Flash sits between Gemini 2.0 Flash (cheaper, less capable) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (more capable, more expensive) in Google's lineup. Its main competitors are other efficient-tier models from OpenAI and Anthropic, and open-weights models that can be self-hosted. For teams prioritizing cost and context window size, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the strongest option in the efficient tier. Its intelligence score of approximately 80/100 reflects strong capable-tier performance — well above typical efficient-tier models.

gemini-2.5-flash Intelligence Score
72/100
72

Composite quality score based on reasoning, coding, and instruction-following benchmarks.

gemini-2.5-flash Pricing vs Efficient Tier
CheapestThis modelMost expensive
$0.030$0.150$1.50

Input price vs 217 efficient models tracked. Avg: $0.321/1M.

Benchmark Scores3 categories

Industry-standard benchmarks grouped by capability. Higher is better. Hover a row for benchmark description.

Reasoningavg 69
GPQA Diamond68/100
MMLU85/100
LiveBench55/100
Codingavg 78
Coding (HumanEval / SWE composite)78/100
Multimodalavg 88
Multimodal (composite)84/100
MMMU82/100
ChartQA91/100
DocVQA93/100
HLEHumanity's Last Exam
GPQAGraduate-level science Q&A
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues (agentic coding)
OSWorldGUI task completion on real desktop
BrowseCompComplex web research via agentic browsing
MMMUMultimodal college-level reasoning
ChartQAChart and figure understanding
DocVQADocument visual question answering
gemini-2.5-flash Capabilities
Vision / Images✓
Function Calling✓
Streaming✓
Prompt Caching✓
Reasoning / CoT✗
Open Weights✗
Computer Use✗
Web Search✗
gemini-2.5-flash Full Specifications
Model IDgemini-2.5-flash
ProviderGoogle
Model FamilyGemini 2.5
TierEfficient
Context Window1,048,576 tokens (1.0M)
Max Output Tokens65,536 tokens
Input Price$0.15 / 1M tokens
Output Price$0.6 / 1M tokens
Cached Input Price$0.0375 / 1M tokens
Throughput220 tokens/sec
Latency (P50)350ms
Intelligence Score72/100
LiveBench Score55/100
Cost per Task (LiveBench)$0.03
Data ConfidenceSupported
HLE Score—
GPQA Diamond68/100
SWE-bench Score—
OSWorld Score—
BrowseComp Score—
Terminal-Bench Score—
AutoBench Score—
Parameters—
Vision SupportYes
Function CallingYes
StreamingYes
Reasoning ModelNo
Open WeightsNo
Data SourceStatic (verified)
Last Updated2026-07-20

Similar Models by Intelligence Score

gemini-2.5-flash Frequently Asked Questions