Compute Comparison
OpenAI/GPT-4oFrontierSupported

gpt-4o

chatvisioncoding
gpt-4o Pricing per 1M tokens
Input$2.50
Output$10.00
Cached input$1.25
View OpenAI
Context Window
128K
tokens
gpt-4o Max Output
16K
tokens
gpt-4o Throughput
110
tokens/sec
gpt-4o Latency P50
520ms
time to first token
About gpt-4oEditorial

GPT-4o ("omni") is OpenAI's flagship multimodal model — a unified replacement for the separate GPT-4 Turbo text and GPT-4V vision pipelines. The "omni" designation reflects its native handling of text, images, and audio in a single model rather than routing inputs through separate specialist modules. It delivers GPT-4 Turbo-level intelligence at roughly half the price and with meaningfully lower latency — a combination that made it the default choice for the majority of production OpenAI deployments. It supports a 128K-token context window, function calling, structured outputs, and streaming, and is available across OpenAI's API and the ChatGPT interface.

GPT-4o is priced at $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens, with prompt caching reducing repeated input to $1.25/1M — a 50% discount that compounds significantly for applications with long shared system prompts or document Q&A patterns. At a typical usage pattern of 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per call, GPT-4o costs approximately $0.0075 per 1,000 API calls. The 4:1 output-to-input price ratio is standard for OpenAI's frontier models and reflects the sequential compute cost of autoregressive generation.

GPT-4o's 128K-token context window handles documents up to roughly 96,000 words — a full novel or a large codebase — in a single API call. Median time-to-first-token (P50 latency) is approximately 320ms under typical load, making it fast enough for interactive chat and real-time applications. Throughput is around 110 tokens per second, sufficient for streaming responses at comfortable reading speed. Maximum output length is 16,384 tokens, which covers most generation tasks including detailed code files, long-form essays, and structured reports. For latency-critical applications, GPT-4o mini (a smaller, faster variant) offers sub-200ms TTFT at a fraction of the cost, though with reduced capability on complex reasoning tasks.

GPT-4o is best suited to applications requiring a balance of capability, cost, and multimodal input: customer-facing chat assistants, document analysis, code generation and review, vision-based workflows (screenshot understanding, diagram interpretation, OCR), and agentic pipelines that combine function calling with multi-step reasoning. Its function calling implementation is among the most mature in the industry, with reliable JSON schema adherence and support for parallel tool calls — making it a strong default for agent frameworks like LangChain, LlamaIndex, and AutoGen. Vision support processes images at a cost of approximately 85–170 tokens per image tile depending on resolution, billed at the standard input rate.

GPT-4o sits at the top of OpenAI's production model lineup, positioned between the cost-optimized GPT-4o mini (efficient tier) and the reasoning-specialized o-series (o3, o4-mini). For tasks requiring deep multi-step reasoning — complex math, competitive programming, scientific analysis — the o3 or o4-mini models use extended chain-of-thought processing and carry higher per-token costs. For high-volume, lower-complexity tasks, GPT-4o mini delivers 80–90% of GPT-4o's quality at roughly 6% of the cost. GPT-4o's sweet spot is the broad middle ground: tasks complex enough to need frontier capability but not so specialized that reasoning models' latency and cost premium are justified. Its intelligence score of approximately 85/100 reflects strong general-purpose capability.

gpt-4o Intelligence Score
78/100
78

Composite quality score based on reasoning, coding, and instruction-following benchmarks.

gpt-4o Pricing vs Frontier Tier
CheapestThis modelMost expensive
$0.200$2.50$150.00

Input price vs 135 frontier models tracked. Avg: $5.69/1M.

Benchmark Scores4 categories

Industry-standard benchmarks grouped by capability. Higher is better. Hover a row for benchmark description.

Reasoningavg 68
GPQA Diamond53/100
MMLU88/100
LiveBench62/100
Codingavg 54
Coding (HumanEval / SWE composite)72/100
SWE-bench Verified49/100
Terminal-Bench (CLI)42/100
Agenticavg 34
OSWorld (Computer Use)38/100
BrowseComp (Web Browsing)55/100
AutoBench (Work Automation)8/100
Multimodalavg 80
Multimodal (composite)74/100
MMMU69/100
ChartQA85/100
DocVQA92/100
HLEHumanity's Last Exam
GPQAGraduate-level science Q&A
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues (agentic coding)
OSWorldGUI task completion on real desktop
BrowseCompComplex web research via agentic browsing
MMMUMultimodal college-level reasoning
ChartQAChart and figure understanding
DocVQADocument visual question answering
gpt-4o Capabilities
Vision / Images✓
Function Calling✓
Streaming✓
Prompt Caching✓
Reasoning / CoT✗
Open Weights✗
Computer Use✗
Web Search✗
gpt-4o Full Specifications
Model IDgpt-4o
ProviderOpenAI
Model FamilyGPT-4o
TierFrontier
Context Window128,000 tokens (128K)
Max Output Tokens16,384 tokens
Input Price$2.5 / 1M tokens
Output Price$10 / 1M tokens
Cached Input Price$1.25 / 1M tokens
Throughput110 tokens/sec
Latency (P50)520ms
Intelligence Score78/100
LiveBench Score62/100
Cost per Task (LiveBench)$0.18
Data ConfidenceSupported
HLE Score—
GPQA Diamond53/100
SWE-bench Score49/100
OSWorld Score38/100
BrowseComp Score55/100
Terminal-Bench Score42/100
AutoBench Score8/100
Parameters—
Vision SupportYes
Function CallingYes
StreamingYes
Reasoning ModelNo
Open WeightsNo
Data SourceStatic (verified)
Last Updated2026-07-20

Similar Models by Intelligence Score

gpt-4o Frequently Asked Questions