iRender

iRender GPU pricing overview

iRender is a specialist GPU cloud provider headquartered in Hanoi, Vietnam. iRender is a GPU cloud provider specializing in AI training, 3D rendering, and VFX workloads, offering RTX 4090, A100, and H100 instances with competitive APAC pricing across global nodes. On-demand hourly GPU rental makes it accessible for creative studios and AI teams in Southeast Asia and beyond who need high-performance GPU compute for both rendering pipelines and model training. A strong choice for APAC-based teams that need a single platform for both AI and creative GPU workloads. Billing is On-demand (hourly) with a minimum commitment of None. Available regions include APAC, US, EU. On-demand GPU instances can be provisioned in minutes with no upfront cost, making iRender suitable for both short-duration experiments and sustained production workloads.

iRender vs other GPU providers

iRender competes with providers including Lambda Labs, CoreWeave, RunPod, Paperspace, Vast.ai, and the major hyperscalers (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure) for GPU compute workloads spanning LLM training, fine-tuning, and inference serving. Key differentiators include: Competitive APAC pricing; RTX 4090 availability; Rendering-optimized. Use the side-by-side comparison tool above to see iRender pricing against any other provider across shared GPU models. For a broader market view, the live GPU prices table shows all active listings alongside 94+ providers in a single sortable view.

Best use cases for iRender

iRender is best suited for: 3D rendering, AI training, APAC-based teams, Creative workloads. Support tiers range from Community → Standard, making it viable for both individual researchers and enterprise teams with SLA requirements. For workloads requiring the highest single-GPU throughput, H100 SXM5 instances with NVLink interconnect deliver the best performance per dollar at scale. For cost-sensitive fine-tuning or inference of models up to 13B parameters, A100 40GB or RTX 4090 instances typically offer the best value.

iRender billing model and cost structure

iRender uses On-demand (hourly) pricing. On-demand instances are billed per second or per hour depending on the instance type, with no termination fees. Spot pricing is not currently available on this provider — all instances are on-demand. Reserved instance pricing, where available, can reduce costs by 30–60% for predictable long-running workloads. Always compare the effective hourly rate including egress, storage, and networking costs when evaluating total cost of ownership across providers.

Choosing the right GPU on iRender

GPU selection depends on model size, precision, and whether your workload is compute-bound or memory-bandwidth-bound. For LLM training above 30B parameters, H100 80GB SXM5 instances with NVLink are the standard choice — the 3,350 GB/s HBM3 bandwidth and 989 TFLOPS FP16 throughput make them 2–2.5× faster than A100 for transformer workloads. For inference of 7B–13B models in FP16 or BF16, A100 40GB offers the best cost-per-token on most providers. RTX 4090 instances are ideal for fine-tuning, prototyping, and quantized inference (INT4/INT8) of models up to 70B. Read the H100 vs A100 guide or the GPU benchmarks for ML guide for a full breakdown.

How iRender pricing data is collected

Prices shown are sourced from iRender's public pricing API or pricing page and refreshed every 15 minutes. On-demand rates reflect the current list price for a single GPU instance in the cheapest available region. Spot prices, where available, reflect interruptible instance rates at the time of the last snapshot. All prices are in USD per hour. Daily snapshots are retained for 90 days and visualised in the GPU price history charts — useful for identifying seasonal pricing patterns and evaluating whether current rates are above or below the 30-day average.

Evaluating managed LLM inference APIs as an alternative to self-hosted GPU compute? Compare live LLM token prices across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Groq, and 14+ other providers. The cheapest GPU cloud guide covers the break-even analysis between self-hosted and managed inference at different request volumes.