LeaderGPU
Specialist CloudLeaderGPU is a European GPU cloud based in the Netherlands offering RTX 3090, A100, and H100 instances with competitive on-demand hourly GPU rental pricing and no minimum commitment, making it accessible for EU-based teams running short-term AI training and fine-tuning workloads. EU data residency and straightforward hourly billing make it a practical choice for European developers and researchers who need flexible GPU access without long-term contracts. A reliable European on-demand GPU cloud for budget-conscious teams.
Cheapest On-Demand
—
Cheapest Spot
—
GPU Listings
0
Billing
On-demand (hourly)
Performance Benchmarks
Compare With Another Cloud Provider
Provider Info
Headquarters
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Founded
2016
Regions
EU
Min Commitment
None
Support
Standard
Strengths
- ▸EU data residency
- ▸Competitive RTX pricing
- ▸No minimum commitment
- ▸Hourly billing
Limitations
- ▸Small provider — limited GPU availability at scale
- ▸Primarily European regions
- ▸Less mature platform vs Lambda or CoreWeave
Best For
Full GPU Catalog
| GPU Model | vRAM | On-Demand | Spot | Availability | Region |
|---|
Community Reviews
Browse Other Providers
LeaderGPU GPU pricing overview
LeaderGPU is a specialist GPU cloud provider headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands. LeaderGPU is a European GPU cloud based in the Netherlands offering RTX 3090, A100, and H100 instances with competitive on-demand hourly GPU rental pricing and no minimum commitment, making it accessible for EU-based teams running short-term AI training and fine-tuning workloads. EU data residency and straightforward hourly billing make it a practical choice for European developers and researchers who need flexible GPU access without long-term contracts. A reliable European on-demand GPU cloud for budget-conscious teams. Billing is On-demand (hourly) with a minimum commitment of None. Available regions include EU. On-demand GPU instances can be provisioned in minutes with no upfront cost, making LeaderGPU suitable for both short-duration experiments and sustained production workloads.
LeaderGPU vs other GPU providers
LeaderGPU competes with providers including Lambda Labs, CoreWeave, RunPod, Paperspace, Vast.ai, and the major hyperscalers (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure) for GPU compute workloads spanning LLM training, fine-tuning, and inference serving. Key differentiators include: EU data residency; Competitive RTX pricing; No minimum commitment. Use the side-by-side comparison tool above to see LeaderGPU pricing against any other provider across shared GPU models. For a broader market view, the live GPU prices table shows all active listings alongside 94+ providers in a single sortable view.
Best use cases for LeaderGPU
LeaderGPU is best suited for: EU-based teams, Budget GPU workloads, Short-term training runs. Support tiers range from Standard, making it viable for both individual researchers and enterprise teams with SLA requirements. For workloads requiring the highest single-GPU throughput, H100 SXM5 instances with NVLink interconnect deliver the best performance per dollar at scale. For cost-sensitive fine-tuning or inference of models up to 13B parameters, A100 40GB or RTX 4090 instances typically offer the best value.
LeaderGPU billing model and cost structure
LeaderGPU uses On-demand (hourly) pricing. On-demand instances are billed per second or per hour depending on the instance type, with no termination fees. Spot pricing is not currently available on this provider — all instances are on-demand. Reserved instance pricing, where available, can reduce costs by 30–60% for predictable long-running workloads. Always compare the effective hourly rate including egress, storage, and networking costs when evaluating total cost of ownership across providers.
Choosing the right GPU on LeaderGPU
GPU selection depends on model size, precision, and whether your workload is compute-bound or memory-bandwidth-bound. For LLM training above 30B parameters, H100 80GB SXM5 instances with NVLink are the standard choice — the 3,350 GB/s HBM3 bandwidth and 989 TFLOPS FP16 throughput make them 2–2.5× faster than A100 for transformer workloads. For inference of 7B–13B models in FP16 or BF16, A100 40GB offers the best cost-per-token on most providers. RTX 4090 instances are ideal for fine-tuning, prototyping, and quantized inference (INT4/INT8) of models up to 70B. Read the H100 vs A100 guide or the GPU benchmarks for ML guide for a full breakdown.
How LeaderGPU pricing data is collected
Prices shown are sourced from LeaderGPU's public pricing API or pricing page and refreshed every 15 minutes. On-demand rates reflect the current list price for a single GPU instance in the cheapest available region. Spot prices, where available, reflect interruptible instance rates at the time of the last snapshot. All prices are in USD per hour. Daily snapshots are retained for 90 days and visualised in the GPU price history charts — useful for identifying seasonal pricing patterns and evaluating whether current rates are above or below the 30-day average.
Evaluating managed LLM inference APIs as an alternative to self-hosted GPU compute? Compare live LLM token prices across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Groq, and 14+ other providers. The cheapest GPU cloud guide covers the break-even analysis between self-hosted and managed inference at different request volumes.
Ready to get started?
Launch your first GPU on LeaderGPU
0 GPU configurations available. On-demand (hourly) billing.