Compute Comparison
Frontier LabProprietary Models

Z.AI

GLM frontier models with 1M context

Z.AI (formerly Zhipu AI) develops the GLM series of large language models. GLM-5.2 supports a 1M token context window and is designed for enterprise-grade chat, coding, and long-document tasks.

GLM-5.2 offers a 1M token context window at $1.11/1M input tokens, making it one of the most cost-effective long-context models available.

ChatCodingLong-document analysisEnterprise AI
Beijing, China
Founded 2019
z.aiOfficial pricing pageDocumentation
Strengths
  • 1M token context window
  • Strong Chinese and English bilingual performance
  • Enterprise-grade reliability
Limitations
  • Smaller international developer community
  • Fewer third-party integrations than OpenAI

All Models

Sort by:
Loading models…

Z.AI — Frequently Asked Questions

Community Reviews

Loading reviews…

All LLM Providers

Full comparison table

Z.AI LLM pricing overview

Z.AI is a proprietary AI lab that develops and hosts its own large language models. Z.AI (formerly Zhipu AI) develops the GLM series of large language models. GLM-5.2 supports a 1M token context window and is designed for enterprise-grade chat, coding, and long-document tasks. Common use cases include Chat, Coding, Long-document analysis, Enterprise AI. Headquartered in Beijing, China, founded 2019. All models are accessible via a REST API compatible with standard OpenAI-style request formats, enabling drop-in integration with most LLM frameworks and orchestration tools.

Z.AI vs other LLM providers

Z.AI competes with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Groq, Together AI, Mistral, Cohere, and other inference API providers across dimensions of price, throughput, latency, context window, and model intelligence. GLM-5.2 offers a 1M token context window at $1.11/1M input tokens, making it one of the most cost-effective long-context models available. Use the LLM provider comparison tool to see Z.AI token pricing, latency, and throughput side-by-side with any other provider. The full LLM pricing table shows all providers ranked by input token cost, output token cost, and throughput in a single sortable view.

Why choose Z.AI?

Z.AI's key strengths are: 1M token context window; Strong Chinese and English bilingual performance; Enterprise-grade reliability. Limitations to consider: Smaller international developer community; Fewer third-party integrations than OpenAI. For teams running high-volume inference workloads, prompt caching and batch API endpoints can reduce effective input token costs by 50–90% — check the context window cost guide for a full breakdown of caching economics.

Understanding Z.AI token pricing

Z.AI charges separately for input (prompt) and output (completion) tokens, priced per 1M tokens in USD. Output tokens are typically 3–5× more expensive than input tokens due to the compute cost of autoregressive generation. Prices shown are sourced from Z.AI's public pricing page and updated daily. Need help estimating your spend? Read the LLM API cost calculator guide — it covers tokens, context windows, prompt caching, and batch discounts with worked examples for RAG, chat history, and document processing workloads.

Z.AI context window and model capabilities

Context window size directly affects both capability and cost — every token in the context window is charged as an input token. For RAG and document processing workloads, longer context windows enable richer retrieval but increase per-call costs proportionally. Prompt caching — where supported — stores the KV state of repeated prefixes and charges 75–90% less for cache hits, making it the most impactful cost optimization for applications with consistent system prompts or retrieved documents. See the LLM context window cost guide for a full analysis of how context length affects your API bill.

Self-hosted vs managed inference: when Z.AI makes sense

Managed inference APIs like Z.AI eliminate infrastructure overhead — no GPU provisioning, driver management, or model serving stack to maintain. The trade-off is cost at scale: a single H100 at ~$2.50/hr can serve ~500K tokens/min of Llama 3.3 70B, which at Z.AI API rates would cost significantly more per token. The break-even point depends on your request volume, latency requirements, and engineering capacity. For teams processing fewer than ~10M tokens/day, managed APIs are almost always cheaper when total cost of ownership is considered. Above that threshold, self-hosted inference on rented GPU compute typically wins on unit economics. Read the cheapest GPU cloud guide for a full break-even analysis. Historical Z.AI token price data is available in the LLM price history charts.