Compute Comparison
Frontier LabOpen WeightsProprietary Models

Black Forest Labs

FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra — the quality benchmark for commercial image generation

Black Forest Labs created FLUX, the model family that has become the quality benchmark for both open and commercial image generation. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra produces photorealistic images at up to 4MP resolution. The 2026 lineup adds FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra (highest quality), FLUX 1.1 Pro (production), FLUX.1 Dev (open-weight, fine-tuning), and FLUX.1 Schnell (open-weight, fastest). FLUX models are available via the BFL API and through Replicate, fal.ai, and other inference platforms.

FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra produces the highest-quality AI images available — consistently outperforming Stable Diffusion and competing with Midjourney on photorealism — with open-weight Dev/Schnell variants for self-hosting.

Commercial image productionPhotorealistic generationCreative AISelf-hosted image generationFine-tuning
Freiburg, Germany
Founded 2024
bfl.ai/Official pricing pageDocumentation
Black Forest Labs Models
4
Black Forest Labs Cheapest Input
—
per 1M tokens
Black Forest Labs Max Throughput
0 t/s
Black Forest Labs Min Latency
1.5s
TTFT p50
Black Forest Labs Best Intelligence
0/100
Black Forest Labs Vision Models
0
Black Forest Labs Strengths
  • FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra: highest-quality commercial image generation available
  • FLUX.1 Dev and Schnell: open-weight models for fine-tuning and self-hosting
  • FLUX.1 Schnell: fastest open-weight image generation model
  • Available on Replicate, fal.ai, and other inference platforms
  • Consistently outperforms Stable Diffusion 3.5 on photorealism benchmarks
  • Strong prompt adherence and text rendering in images
Black Forest Labs Weaknesses
  • Newer company with smaller ecosystem than Stable Diffusion
  • Pro models require API access — no self-hosting for highest quality
  • Less community fine-tuning ecosystem than SD
Black Forest Labs Model Tiers
frontier
2
advanced
1
efficient
0
budget
1
Black Forest Labs Capabilities
Vision0
Tool Use0
Reasoning0
Open Weights2
Multilingual0
RAG / Search0
Structured Out0
Embeddings0
Black Forest Labs Intelligence vs Pricelog scale
frontieradvancedefficientbudget
Black Forest Labs Throughput (tokens/sec)
Black Forest Labs Input vs Output Pricing ($/1M tokens)
InputOutput
Black Forest Labs Context Window (tokens)
Black Forest Labs Best Model by Use Case
image-generation
flux-1.1-pro
frontier$0.00/1M in
quality
flux-1.1-pro
frontier$0.00/1M in
high-resolution
flux-1.1-pro-ultra
frontier$0.00/1M in
open-weights
flux-dev
advanced$0.00/1M in
speed
flux-schnell
budget$0.00/1M in
cost
flux-schnell
budget$0.00/1M in

Black Forest Labs Models

Sort by:
← swipe to scroll →
ModelModalityTierPriceCached /1MTTFTThroughputContextIntel.Caps
flux-1.1-pro
FLUX
Imagefrontier
$0.04
per image
EST Jul 2026
—5.0s0 t/s4K
0
flux-1.1-pro-ultra
FLUX
Imagefrontier
$0.06
per image
EST Jul 2026
—7.0s0 t/s4K
0
flux-dev
FLUX
Imageadvanced
$0.03
per image
EST Jul 2026
—4.0s0 t/s4K
0
flux-schnell
FLUX
Imagebudget
$0.00
per image
EST Jul 2026
—1.5s0 t/s4K
0

Black Forest Labs — Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Black Forest Labs Reviews

Loading reviews...

All LLM Providers

Full comparison table

Black Forest Labs LLM pricing overview

Black Forest Labs is a proprietary AI lab that develops and hosts its own large language models. Black Forest Labs created FLUX, the model family that has become the quality benchmark for both open and commercial image generation. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra produces photorealistic images at up to 4MP resolution. The 2026 lineup adds FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra (highest quality), FLUX 1.1 Pro (production), FLUX.1 Dev (open-weight, fine-tuning), and FLUX.1 Schnell (open-weight, fastest). FLUX models are available via the BFL API and through Replicate, fal.ai, and other inference platforms. Common use cases include Commercial image production, Photorealistic generation, Creative AI, Self-hosted image generation. Headquartered in Freiburg, Germany, founded 2024. All models are accessible via a REST API compatible with standard OpenAI-style request formats, enabling drop-in integration with most LLM frameworks and orchestration tools.

Black Forest Labs vs other LLM providers

Black Forest Labs competes with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Groq, Together AI, Mistral, Cohere, and other inference API providers across dimensions of price, throughput, latency, context window, and model intelligence. FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra produces the highest-quality AI images available — consistently outperforming Stable Diffusion and competing with Midjourney on photorealism — with open-weight Dev/Schnell variants for self-hosting. Use the LLM provider comparison tool to see Black Forest Labs token pricing, latency, and throughput side-by-side with any other provider. The full LLM pricing table shows all providers ranked by input token cost, output token cost, and throughput in a single sortable view.

Why choose Black Forest Labs?

Black Forest Labs stands out because: FLUX 1.1 Pro Ultra produces the highest-quality AI images available — consistently outperforming Stable Diffusion and competing with Midjourney on photorealism — with open-weight Dev/Schnell variants for self-hosting.. The API currently offers 4 models, spanning 2 frontier, 1 advanced, 1 budget tiers. For teams running high-volume inference workloads, prompt caching and batch API endpoints can reduce effective input token costs by 50–90% — check the context window cost guide for a full breakdown of caching economics.

Understanding Black Forest Labs token pricing

Black Forest Labs charges separately for input (prompt) and output (completion) tokens, priced per 1M tokens in USD. Output tokens are typically 3–5× more expensive than input tokens due to the compute cost of autoregressive generation. Prices shown are sourced from Black Forest Labs's public pricing page and updated every 15 minutes. Need help estimating your spend? Read the LLM API cost calculator guide — it covers tokens, context windows, prompt caching, and batch discounts with worked examples for RAG, chat history, and document processing workloads.

Black Forest Labs context window and model capabilities

Context window size directly affects both capability and cost — every token in the context window is charged as an input token. Black Forest Labs's largest context window is 4K tokens. For RAG and document processing workloads, longer context windows enable richer retrieval but increase per-call costs proportionally. Prompt caching — where supported — stores the KV state of repeated prefixes and charges 75–90% less for cache hits, making it the most impactful cost optimization for applications with consistent system prompts or retrieved documents. See the LLM context window cost guide for a full analysis of how context length affects your API bill.

Self-hosted vs managed inference: when Black Forest Labs makes sense

Managed inference APIs like Black Forest Labs eliminate infrastructure overhead — no GPU provisioning, driver management, or model serving stack to maintain. The trade-off is cost at scale: a single H100 at ~$2.50/hr can serve ~500K tokens/min of Llama 3.3 70B, which at Black Forest Labs API rates would cost significantly more per token. The break-even point depends on your request volume, latency requirements, and engineering capacity. For teams processing fewer than ~10M tokens/day, managed APIs are almost always cheaper when total cost of ownership is considered. Above that threshold, self-hosted inference on rented GPU compute typically wins on unit economics. Read the cheapest GPU cloud guide for a full break-even analysis. Historical Black Forest Labs token price data is available in the LLM price history charts.

Compare Black Forest Labs With Another LLM Provider

Compare Black Forest Labs vs other providers

Side-by-side token pricing, latency, throughput, and context window. View all LLM provider comparisons →

Looking for alternatives?

Compare Black Forest Labs with other LLM API providers side by side.

Black Forest Labs alternatives